Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35366280›Full record

ArticlePathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology2021

Local and Remote Effects of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Administration on Skin Wound Regeneration.

Ekaterina Silina, Victor Stupin, Konstantin Koreyba, Sergey Bolevich, Yulia Suzdaltseva, Natalia Manturova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mesodermal Derivatives of Pluripotent Stem Cells Route to Scarless Healing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ekaterina SilinaDepartment of Human Pathology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0246-5149
Victor StupinDepartment of Hospital Surgery №1, N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (RNRMU), 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Konstantin KoreybaDepartment of Hospital Surgery №1, N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (RNRMU), 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Sergey BolevichDepartment of Human Pathology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Yulia SuzdaltsevaDepartment of Human and Animal Epigenetics, Vavilov Institute of General Genetics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 119333 Moscow, Russia.
Natalia ManturovaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cosmetology and Cell Technologies, N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University · RUSechenov University · RUVavilov Institute of General Genetics · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound healing is an important medical problem. We evaluated the efficacy of locally administered mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) isolated from human umbilical cords on the dynamics of skin wound healing. The study was conducted on the backs of Wistar rats, where two square wounds were created by removing all layers of the skin. Four groups were studied in two series of experiments: (1) a Control_NaCl group (the wounds were injected with 0.9% NaCl solution) and a Control_0 group (intact wounds on the opposite side of the same rat's back); (2) an MSC group (injected MSCs, local effect) and a Control_sc group (intact wounds on the opposite side of the back, remote MSC effect). The area and temperature of the wounds and the microcirculation of the wound edges were measured. Histological and morphometric studies were performed on days 3 and 7 after the wounds were created. The results showed that the injection trauma (Control_NaCl) slowed the regeneration process. In both MSC groups (unlike in either control group), we observed no increase in the area of the wounds; in addition, we observed inhibition of the inflammatory process and improved wound regeneration on days 1-3 in the remote group and days 1-5 in the local (injected) group. The MSC and Control_sc groups demonstrated improved microcirculation and suppression of leukocyte infiltration on day 3. On day 7, all the studied parameters of the wounds of the Control_0 group were the same as those of the wounds that received cell therapy, although in contrast to the results of the Control_ NaCl group, fibroblast proliferation was greater in the MSC and Control_sc groups. The dynamics of the size of the wounds were comparable for both local and remote application of MSCs. Thus, even a one-time application of MSCs was effective during the first 3-5 days after injury due to anti-inflammatory processes, which improved the regeneration process. Remote application of MSC, as opposed to direct injection, is advisable, especially in the case of multiple wounds, since the results were indistinguishable between the groups and injection trauma was shown to slow healing.

Indexed as

fibroblastshuman umbilical cordinflammationleukocyteslocal and remote stem cell effectsmesenchymal stem cellsregenerationskin woundwound healing

Identifiers

PMID35366280
PMCPMC8830469
OpenAlexW3193869143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.