Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35366146›Full record

ArticlePsychometrika2022

Forecasting Intra-individual Changes of Affective States Taking into Account Inter-individual Differences Using Intensive Longitudinal Data from a University Student Dropout Study in Math.

Augustin Kelava, Pascal Kilian, Judith Glaesser, Samuel Merk, Holger Brandt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychometrika, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Augustin KelavaMethods Center, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. augustin.kelava@uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID 0000-0001-6053-0415
Pascal KilianMethods Center, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Judith GlaesserMethods Center, University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Samuel MerkMethods Center, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Holger BrandtMethods Center, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The longitudinal process that leads to university student dropout in STEM subjects can be described by referring to (a) inter-individual differences (e.g., cognitive abilities) as well as (b) intra-individual changes (e.g., affective states), (c) (unobserved) heterogeneity of trajectories, and d) time-dependent variables. Large dynamic latent variable model frameworks for intensive longitudinal data (ILD) have been proposed which are (partially) capable of simultaneously separating the complex data structures (e.g., DLCA; Asparouhov et al. in Struct Equ Model 24:257-269, 2017; DSEM; Asparouhov et al. in Struct Equ Model 25:359-388, 2018; NDLC-SEM, Kelava and Brandt in Struct Equ Model 26:509-528, 2019). From a methodological perspective, forecasting in dynamic frameworks allowing for real-time inferences on latent or observed variables based on ongoing data collection has not been an extensive research topic. From a practical perspective, there has been no empirical study on student dropout in math that integrates ILD, dynamic frameworks, and forecasting of critical states of the individuals allowing for real-time interventions. In this paper, we show how Bayesian forecasting of multivariate intra-individual variables and time-dependent class membership of individuals (affective states) can be performed in these dynamic frameworks using a Forward Filtering Backward Sampling method. To illustrate our approach, we use an empirical example where we apply the proposed forecasting method to ILD from a large university student dropout study in math with multivariate observations collected over 50 measurement occasions from multiple students ([Formula: see text]). More specifically, we forecast emotions and behavior related to dropout. This allows us to predict emerging critical dynamic states (e.g., critical stress levels or pre-decisional states) 8 weeks before the actual dropout occurs.

Indexed as

IndividualityStudent DropoutsBayes TheoremEmotionsHumansPsychometricsUniversitiesBayesiandynamic factor modelsforecastingnonlinearstructural equation modeltime series

Identifiers

PMID35366146
PMCPMC9166886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.