Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35366144›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2022

Comparison of the prevalence and associated factors of cognitive frailty between elderly and middle-young patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis.

Guanjie Chen, Hailin Zhang, Xiaoju Du, Lixia Yin, Huipin Zhang, Qifan Zhou

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cognitive frailty in maintenance hemodialysis: a scoping review.International urology and nephrology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Guanjie ChenThe Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, No 6, Zhenhua East Rd, Haizhou district, Lianyungang, 222061, Jiangsu, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5946-6452
Hailin ZhangThe Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, No 6, Zhenhua East Rd, Haizhou district, Lianyungang, 222061, Jiangsu, China. tangjasper66@gmail.com.
Xiaoju DuThe Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Lixia YinDepartment of Hemopurification Center, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China.
Huipin ZhangThe Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, No 6, Zhenhua East Rd, Haizhou district, Lianyungang, 222061, Jiangsu, China.
Qifan ZhouLianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China.
Xuzhou Medical College · CNLianyungang Oriental Hospital · CNThe First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed at comparing the prevalence of cognitive frailty and explore the differences in the influencing factors between elderly and middle-young patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis (MHD).

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, the frailty phenotype, mini-mental state examination, and clinical dementia rating were used to assess the current status of cognitive frailty in 852 patients receiving MHD from four hospitals in Lianyungang City and Xuzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China; the influencing factors were then analyzed for statistical significance.

resultsOf the total 852 patients receiving MHD, 340 were classified into an elderly group (≥ 60 years) and 512 into a middle-young group (< 60 years). The prevalence of cognitive frailty was 35.9% and 8.8%, respectively. The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the independent factors of cognitive frailty were age (P < 0.001), education level (P = 0.010), nutritional status (P = 0.001), serum albumin level (P = 0.010), calf circumference (P = 0.024), and social support level (P < 0.001) in the elderly group and comorbidity status (P = 0.037), education level (P < 0.001), nutritional status (P = 0.008), serum creatinine level (P = 0.001), waist circumference (P < 0.001), and depression (P = 0.006) in the middle-young group.

conclusionThe prevalence of cognitive frailty was significantly higher in the elderly group than in the middle-young group, and the influencing factors differed between the two populations.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionFrailtyAgedCognitionCross-Sectional StudiesFrail ElderlyGeriatric AssessmentHumansPrevalenceRenal DialysisCognitive frailtyHemodialysisInfluencing factorPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID35366144
PMCPMC9463251
OpenAlexW4225659820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.