Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35366049›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical radiation sciences2022

Can optical scanning technologies replace CT for 3D printed medical devices in radiation oncology?

Michael John James Douglass

Open access · goldAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Continuing Professional Development-Radiation Therapy.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael John James DouglassDepartment of Medical Physics, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3862-2644
Royal Adelaide Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3D printing is being increasingly adopted in radiation oncology for printing highly conformal medical devices for treatment. Optical surface reconstruction technologies have been shown to be useful for 3D printing applications due to their higher spatial resolution, non-ionising radiation imaging and will likely supplement existing radiographic imaging techniques in the future.

Indexed as

Radiation OncologyPhantoms, ImagingPrinting, Three-DimensionalRadionuclide ImagingTomography, X-Ray Computed3D printing3D scanningbolusbrachytherapyLIDARphotogrammetryradiation oncologystructured light scanner

Identifiers

PMID35366049
PMCPMC9163457
OpenAlexW4225620551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.