Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35366038›Full record

ArticleHead & neck2022

Head and neck pedicled flap autonomization using a new high-resolution indocyanine green fluorescence video-angiography device.

Leone Giordano, Andrea Galli, Marco Familiari, Davide Canta, Ayhan Irem, Matteo Biafora, Rosa Alessia Battista, Mario Bussi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Head & neck, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Indocyanine green fluorescence video-angiography for flap perfusion assessment in head and neck reconstruction: a prospective study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leone GiordanoDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Scientific Institutes of Hospitalization and Care San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9094-4205
Andrea GalliDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Scientific Institutes of Hospitalization and Care San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2677-8091
Marco FamiliariDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Scientific Institutes of Hospitalization and Care San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9763-3183
Davide CantaDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Scientific Institutes of Hospitalization and Care San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy.
Ayhan IremDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Scientific Institutes of Hospitalization and Care San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy.
Matteo BiaforaDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Scientific Institutes of Hospitalization and Care San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy.
Rosa Alessia BattistaDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Scientific Institutes of Hospitalization and Care San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2391-2008
Mario BussiDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Scientific Institutes of Hospitalization and Care San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In head and neck oncologic surgery a reconstructive phase is often required and pedicled flaps are still a viable option, though they may need a pedicle division performed at a later stage. Several techniques are commonly used for perfusion assessment of the flaps, with indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence video-angiography representing a promising tool. We used ICG video-angiography to evaluate the perfusion of two of the most commonly adopted pedicled flaps in the head and neck field (the supraclavicular and the paramedian forehead flap) before and after second-stage pedicle division, allowing a safer in-setting. Moreover, the new high-resolution device that we have employed added further accuracy to the traditional video-angiography, providing a real-time flap-to-normal skin ICG ratio. Indeed, ICG video-angiography proved to be a useful tool in head and neck reconstructive surgery and it may allow an earlier second-stage pedicle division.

Indexed as

Indocyanine GreenPlastic Surgery ProceduresAngiographyFluorescenceHumansSurgical FlapsIndocyanine Greenfacial neoplasmshead and neck neoplasmsindocyanine greenreconstructive surgical proceduresurgical flaps

Identifiers

PMID35366038
PMCPMC9321191
OpenAlexW4224017386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.