Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35366034›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2022

An approach to defining and achieving restoration targets for a threatened plant community.

C P Elliott, L E Commander, L Merino-Martín, P J Golos, J Stevens, B P Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. An approach to defining and achieving restoration targets for a threatened plant community.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

C P ElliottKings Park Science, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Kings Park, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1744-4911
L E CommanderKings Park Science, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Kings Park, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9379-4564
L Merino-MartínKings Park Science, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Kings Park, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0343-0546
P J GolosKings Park Science, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Kings Park, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3588-7011
J StevensKings Park Science, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Kings Park, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5821-9206
B P MillerKings Park Science, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Kings Park, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8569-6697

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Connecting scientific research and government policy is essential for achieving objectives in sustaining biodiversity in an economic context. Our approach to connecting theoretical ecology, applied ecology, and policy was devised using principles of restoration ecology and the requisite methodology to restore biodiverse ecosystems. Using a threatened ecological community (TEC) with >120 plant species, we posit our approach as a guide for interpreting and achieving regulatory compliance (i.e., government conditions) enacted to manage or offset environmental impacts of development. We inform the scientific approach necessary to delivering outcomes appropriate to policy intent and biodiverse restoration through theoretical and applied research into the ecological restoration of the highly endemic flora of banded ironstone formations of the Mid West of Western Australia. Our approach (1) defines scale-appropriate restoration targets that meet regulatory compliance (e.g., Government of Western Australia Ministerial Conditions); (2) determines the optimal method to return individual plant species to the restoration landscape; (3) develops a conceptual model for our system, based on existing restoration frameworks, to optimize and facilitate the pathway to the restoration of a vegetation community (e.g., TEC) using diverse research approaches; and (4) develops an assessment protocol to compare restoration achievements against the expected regulatory outcomes using our experimental restoration trials as a test example. Our approach systematically addressed the complex challenges in setting and achieving restoration targets for an entire vegetation community, a first for a semiarid environment. We interpret our approach as an industry application relevant to policy- or regulator-mediated mine restoration programs that seek to return biodiverse species assemblages at landscape scales.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemBiodiversityPlantsWestern Australiabanded iron formationemergencegerminationthreatened ecological communityvegetation composition

Identifiers

PMID35366034
PMCPMC9539575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.