Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35366022›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2022

Hard versus soft selective sweeps during domestication and improvement in soybean.

Limei Zhong, Youlin Zhu, Kenneth M Olsen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Limei ZhongKey Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Gene Engineering in Jiangxi, School of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7472-5245
Youlin ZhuKey Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Gene Engineering in Jiangxi, School of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Kenneth M OlsenDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8338-3638
Nanchang University · CNWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome scans for selection can provide an efficient way to dissect the genetic basis of domestication traits and understand mechanisms of adaptation during crop evolution. Selection involving soft sweeps (simultaneous selection for multiple alleles) is probably common in plant genomes but is under-studied, and few if any studies have systematically scanned for soft sweeps in the context of crop domestication. Using genome resequencing data from 302 wild and domesticated soybean accessions, we conducted selection scans using five widely employed statistics to identify selection candidates under classical (hard) and soft sweeps. Across the genome, inferred hard sweeps are predominant in domesticated soybean landraces and improved varieties, whereas soft sweeps are more prevalent in a representative subpopulation of the wild ancestor. Six domestication-related genes, representing both hard and soft sweeps and different stages of domestication, were used as positive controls to assess the detectability of domestication-associated sweeps. Performance of various test statistics suggests that differentiation-based (F

Indexed as

DomesticationGlycine maxGenome, PlantQuantitative Trait LociSelection, Geneticdomesticationgenome scanhard sweepsoft sweepsoybean (Glycine max)

Identifiers

PMID35366022
OpenAlexW4223503426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.