ArticleEuropean journal of heart failure2022
Comparing and contrasting risk factors for heart failure in patients with and without history of myocardial infarction: data from HOMAGE and the UK Biobank.
Article in European journal of heart failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Prediction of Heart Failure Risk From Single-Lead Electrocardiograms.JAMA cardiology · 2025Article
- Metabolic syndrome, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and the risk of heart failure: the Kailuan cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems targeting inflammatory immune mechanisms in acute myocardial infarction: current advances and perspectives.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence Enabled Prediction of Heart Failure Risk from Single-lead Electrocardiograms.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Significance of plasma TGF-β1 level detection in patients with T2DM with heart failure.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2024Article
- Differences in predictors of incident heart failure according to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease status.ESC heart failure · 2023Article
- Defining Heart Failure Based on Imaging the Heart and Beyond.Cardiac failure review · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
20 authors at 12 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimsMyocardial infarction (MI) is among the commonest attributable risk factors for heart failure (HF). We compared clinical characteristics associated with the progression to HF in patients with or without a history of MI in the HOMAGE cohort and validated our results in UK Biobank. METHODS AND
resultsDuring a follow-up of 5.2 (3.5-5.9) years, 177 (2.4%) patients with prior MI and 370 (1.92%) patients without prior MI experienced HF onset in the HOMAGE cohort (n = 26 478, history of MI: n = 7241). Older age, male sex and higher heart rate were significant risk factors of HF onset in patients with and without prior MI. Lower renal function was more strongly associated with HF onset in patients with prior MI. Higher body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure and blood glucose were significantly associated with HF onset only in patients without prior MI (all p for interactions <0.05). In the UK Biobank (n = 500 001, history of MI: n = 4555), higher BMI, glycated haemoglobin, diabetes and hypertension had a stronger association with HF onset in participants without prior MI compared to participants with MI (all p for interactions <0.05).
conclusionThe importance of clinical risk factors associated with HF onset is dependent on whether the patient has had a prior MI. Diabetes and hypertension are associated with new-onset HF only in the absence of MI history. Patients may benefit from targeted risk management based on MI history.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.