Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35365823›Full record

ReviewStem cells translational medicine2022

Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Coronary Artery Disease: From Bench to Bedside.

Francesco Pelliccia, Marco Zimarino, Giuseppe De Luca, Nicola Viceconte, Gaetano Tanzilli, Raffaele De Caterina

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cells translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. VEGFR1 as a Target for Cardiovascular Gene Therapy.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2025
    Review
  10. Endothelial Progenitor Cells: Disease Markers and Potential Therapy in Kidney Disease.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco PellicciaDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1260-1308
Marco ZimarinoInstitute of Cardiology, "G. d'Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy.
Giuseppe De LucaDivision of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore della Carità, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.
Nicola ViceconteDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Gaetano TanzilliDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Raffaele De CaterinaUniversity of Pisa and Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · ITUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are a heterogeneous group of cells present in peripheral blood at various stages of endothelial differentiation. EPCs have been extensively investigated in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), with controversial findings both on their role in atherosclerosis progression and in the process of neointimal growth after a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Despite nearly 2 decades of experimental and clinical investigations, however, the significance of EPCs in clinical practice remains unclear and poorly understood. This review provides an update on the role of EPCs in the most common clinical scenarios that are experienced by cardiologists managing patients with CAD. We here summarize the main findings on the association of EPCs with cardiovascular risk factors, coronary atherosclerosis, and myocardial ischemia. We then discuss the potential effects of EPCs in post-PCI in-stent restenosis, as well as most recent findings with EPC-coated stents. Based on the mounting evidence of the relationship between levels of EPCs and several different adverse cardiovascular events, EPCs are emerging as novel predictive biomarkers of long-term outcomes in patients with CAD.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseEndothelial Progenitor CellsMyocardial IschemiaPercutaneous Coronary InterventionHumansStentscoronary artery diseaseendothelial progenitor cellspercutaneous coronary interventionprognosis

Identifiers

PMID35365823
PMCPMC9154346
OpenAlexW4214895970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.