Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35365750›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A multi-omics approach to elucidate the mechanisms of action of a dietary muramidase administered to broiler chickens.

Giorgio Brugaletta, Alessandra De Cesare, Luca Laghi, Gerardo Manfreda, Marco Zampiga, Chiara Oliveri, Estefanía Pérez-Calvo, Gilberto Litta, Susanna Lolli, Federico Sirri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Comparative study ofScientific reports · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giorgio BrugalettaDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Bologna, 40064, Italy.
Alessandra De CesareDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Bologna, 40064, Italy. alessandra.decesare@unibo.it.
Luca LaghiDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Bologna, 40064, Italy.
Gerardo ManfredaDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Bologna, 40064, Italy.
Marco ZampigaDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Bologna, 40064, Italy.
Chiara OliveriDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Bologna, 40064, Italy.
Estefanía Pérez-CalvoResearch Center for Animal Nutrition and Health, DSM Nutritional Products, Village-Neuf, Saint Louis, 68305, France.
Gilberto LittaDSM Nutritional Products, Animal Nutrition and Health, Segrate, Milano, 20054, Italy.
Susanna LolliDSM Nutritional Products, Animal Nutrition and Health, Segrate, Milano, 20054, Italy.
Federico SirriDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Bologna, 40064, Italy.
University of Bologna · ITInstitute of Biomedical Technologies · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A novel dietary muramidase has been shown to have positive effects on broiler chickens. However, very little is known about its mechanisms of action. The present multi-omics investigation sought to address this knowledge gap. A total of 2,340 day-old male broilers were assigned to 3 groups (12 replicates each) fed, from 0 to 42 d, a basal diet (control group-CON) or the basal diet supplemented with muramidase at 25,000 (low-dose group-MUL) or 45,000 LSU(F)/kg feed (high-dose group-MUH). MUH significantly outperformed CON in terms of cumulative feed intake (4,798 vs 4,705 g), body weight (2,906 vs 2,775 g), and feed conversion ratio (1.686 vs 1.729), while MUL exhibited intermediate performance. At caecal level, MUH showed the lowest alpha diversity, a significantly different beta diversity, a reduction in Firmicutes, and a rise in Bacteroidetes, especially compared with MUL. MUH also exhibited a considerable decrease in Clostridiaceae and an overrepresentation of Bacteroidaceae and Lactobacillaceae. At blood level, MUH had lower hypoxanthine-probably due to its drop at caecal level-histidine, and uracil, while greater pyruvate, 2-oxoglutarate, and glucose. This study sheds light on the mode of action of this muramidase and lays the groundwork for future investigations on its effects on the intestinal ecosystem and systemic metabolism of broiler chickens.

Indexed as

ChickensMuramidaseAnimal FeedAnimalsDietEcosystemMaleMuramidase

Identifiers

PMID35365750
PMCPMC8976025
OpenAlexW4220728959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.