Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35365721›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Intelligent escalator passenger safety management.

Vasily Osipov, Nataly Zhukova, Alexey Subbotin, Petr Glebovskiy, Elena Evnevich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vasily OsipovSaint-Petersburg Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 39, 14 Line, St. Petersburg, 199178, Russia.
Nataly ZhukovaSaint-Petersburg Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 39, 14 Line, St. Petersburg, 199178, Russia.
Alexey SubbotinSaint-Petersburg State Electrotechnical University, Prof. Popov Street 5, St. Petersburg, 197376, Russia. ansubbotin@stud.etu.ru.
Petr GlebovskiySaint-Petersburg Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 39, 14 Line, St. Petersburg, 199178, Russia.
Elena EvnevichSaint-Petersburg Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 39, 14 Line, St. Petersburg, 199178, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article addresses an approach to intelligent safety control of passengers on escalators. The aim is to improve the accuracy of detecting threatening situations on escalators in the subway to make decisions to prevent threats and eliminate the consequences. The novelty of the approach lies in the complex processing of information from three types of sources (video, audio, sensors) using machine learning methods and recurrent neural networks with controlled elements. The conditions and indicators of safety assurance efficiency are clarified. New methods and algorithms for managing the safety of passengers on escalators are proposed. The architecture of a promising safety software system is developed, and implementation of its components for cloud and fog computing environments is provided. Modeling results confirm the capabilities and advantages of the proposed technological solutions for enhancing the safety of escalator passengers, efficiency of control decision making, and system usability. Due to the proposed solutions, it has become possible to increase the speed of identifying situations 3.5 times and increase the accuracy of their determination by 26%. The efficiency of decision making has increased by almost 30%.

Indexed as

Elevators and EscalatorsNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsSafety ManagementSoftware

Identifiers

PMID35365721
PMCPMC8976071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.