ArticleScientific reports2022
Identifying influential spreaders in complex networks for disease spread and control.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Simulating targeted vaccination strategies with network-based and agent-based models: A scoping review.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Quantifying edge relevance for epidemic spreading via the semi-metric topology of complex networks.Journal of physics. Complexity · 2025Article
- Combining population genomics, larval dispersal modelling and graph theory to reveal connectivity patterns of the black-lipped pearl oyster in French Polynesia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Assessing the impact of sampling bias on node centralities in synthetic and biological networks.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Article
- Identifying Influential Nodes Based on Evidence Theory in Complex Network.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Influential nodes identification for complex networks based on multi-feature fusion.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An overlooked poultry trade network of the smallholder farms in the border provinces of Thailand, 2021: implications for avian influenza surveillance.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- The spatiotemporal analysis of the population migration network in China, 2021.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2023Article
- Minimizing outbreak through targeted blocking for disease control: a community-based approach using super-spreader node identification.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying influential spreaders is an important task in controlling the spread of information and epidemic diseases in complex networks. Many recent studies have indicated that the identification of influential spreaders is dependent on the spreading dynamics. Finding a general optimal order of node importance ranking is difficult because of the complexity of network structures and the physical background of dynamics. In this paper, we use four metrics, namely, betweenness, degree, H-index, and coreness, to measure the central attributes of nodes for constructing the disease spreading models and target immunization strategies. Numerical simulations show that spreading processes based on betweenness centrality lead to the widest range of propagation and the smallest epidemic threshold for all six networks (including four real networks and two BA scale-free networks generated according to Barabasi-Albert algorithm). The target immunization strategy based on the betweenness centrality of nodes is the most effective for BA scale-free networks but displays poor immune effect for real networks in identifying the most important spreaders for disease control. The immunization strategy based on node degrees is the most effective for the four real networks. Findings show that the target immune strategy based on the betweenness centrality of nodes works best for standard scale-free networks, whereas that based on node degrees works best for other nonstandard scale-free networks. The results can provide insights into understanding the different metrics of measuring node importance in disease transmission and control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.