ArticleScientific reports2022
Equivalency of four research-grade movement sensors to assess movement behaviors and its implications for population surveillance.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Burden of heat stress on residual work capacity among farmers living with chronic HIV in Siaya county, Kenya: a longitudinal observational study protocol.BMC public health · 2025Observational
- Relative and absolute intensity accelerometer metrics decipher the effects of age, sex, and occupation on physical activity.BMC public health · 2025Observational
- Construct validity and responsiveness of clinical upper limb measures and sensor-based arm use within the first year after stroke: a longitudinal cohort study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Observational
- Article
- Article
- Mobility Assessment Instruments.Seminars in oncology nursing · 2024Review
- Self-supervised learning of accelerometer data provides new insights for sleep and its association with mortality.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- The use of commercial wrist-worn technology to track physiological outcomes in behavioral interventions.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2023Review
- Self-supervised learning of accelerometer data provides new insights for sleep and its association with mortality.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Estimating sleep duration: performance of open-source processing of actigraphy compared to in-laboratory polysomnography in the community.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
the benefits of physical activity (PA) and sleep for health, accurate and objective population-based surveillance is important. Monitor-based surveillance has potential, but the main challenge is the need for replicable outcomes from different monitors. This study investigated the agreement of movement behavior outcomes assessed with four research-grade activity monitors (i.e., Movisens Move4, ActiGraph GT3X+, GENEActiv, and Axivity AX3) in adults. Twenty-three participants wore four monitors on the non-dominant wrist simultaneously for seven days. Open-source software (GGIR) was used to estimate the daily time in sedentary, light, moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA), and sleep (movement behaviors). The prevalence of participants meeting the PA and sleep recommendations were calculated from each monitor's data. Outcomes were deemed equivalent between monitors if the absolute standardized difference and its 95% confidence intervals (CI
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.