Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35365511›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgery versus casting for elderly patients with

D P Ter Meulen, M A M Mulders, A A Kruiswijk, E J Kret, M E Slichter, J M van Dongen, G M M J Kerkhoffs, J C Goslings, Y V Kleinlugtenbelt, N W Willigenburg and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03009890 (The Effectiveness of Surgery Versus Casting for Elderly Patients With Displaced Distal Intra-Articular Radius Fractures), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03009890 nacompletednot on this map

The Effectiveness of Surgery Versus Casting for Elderly Patients With Displaced Distal Intra-Articular Radius Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorJointResearchRan2017 to 2022Enrolled138ConditionsRadius Distal FractureArmsSurgery (Open Reduction Internal Fixation), Cast treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

D P Ter MeulenOrthopedic Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands d.termeulen@olvg.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-6600-3330
M A M MuldersTrauma Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0575-0447
A A KruiswijkOrthopedic Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4827-7466
E J KretOrthopedic Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9485-1786
M E SlichterOrthopedic Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7085-8622
J M van DongenDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, and the Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1606-8742
G M M J KerkhoffsOrthopedic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5916-7049
J C GoslingsTrauma Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3942-0304
Y V KleinlugtenbeltOrthopedic Surgery, Deventer Ziekenhuis, Deventer, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9332-1086
N W WilligenburgOrthopedic Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
N W L SchepTrauma Surgery, Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3698-7658
R W PoolmanOrthopedic Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3178-2247
DART Study Group
OLVG · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLDepartment of Medical Sciences · BYDeventer Ziekenhuis · NLMaasstad Ziekenhuis · NLOrthopaedic Trauma Association · USReinier de Graaf Hospital · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCurrent literature is inconclusive about the optimal treatment of elderly patients with displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures. Cast treatment is less invasive and less expensive than surgical treatment. Nevertheless, surgery is often the preferred treatment for this common type of distal radius fracture. Patients with a non-acceptable position after closed reduction are more likely to benefit from surgery than patients with an acceptable position after closed reduction. Therefore, this study aims to assess non-inferiority of functional outcomes after casting versus surgery in elderly patients with a non-acceptable position following a distal radius fracture. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) with a non-inferiority design and an economic evaluation alongside. The population consists of patients aged 65 years and older with a displaced intra-articular distal radius fracture with non-acceptable radiological characteristics following either inadequate reduction or redisplacement after adequate reduction. Patients will be randomised between surgical treatment (open reduction and internal fixation) and non-operative treatment (closed reduction followed by cast treatment). We will use two age strata (65-75 and >75 years of age) and a web-based mixed block randomisation. A total of 154 patients will be enrolled and evaluated with the patient-rated wrist evaluation as the primary outcome at 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes include the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, quality of life (measured by the EQ-5D), wrist range of motion, grip strength and adverse events. In addition, we will perform a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis from a societal and healthcare perspective. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, cost-effectiveness planes and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves will be presented. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Research and Ethics Committee approved this RCT (NL56858.100.16). The results of this study will be reported in a peer-reviewed journal. We will present the results of this study at (inter)national conferences and disseminate the results through guideline committees. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03009890). Dutch Trial Registry (NTR6365).

Indexed as

Radius FracturesAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisEquivalence Trials as TopicFracture Fixation, InternalHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRange of Motion, ArticularTreatment Outcomeclinical trialshand & wristmusculoskeletal disordersorthopaedic & trauma surgerytrauma management

Identifiers

PMID35365511
PMCPMC8977782
OpenAlexW4220731861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.