Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35365510›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Predicting hospitalisations related to ambulatory care sensitive conditions with machine learning for population health planning: derivation and validation cohort study.

Seung Eun Yi, Vinyas Harish, Jahir Gutierrez, Mathieu Ravaut, Kathy Kornas, Tristan Watson, Tomi Poutanen, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Maksims Volkovs, Laura C Rosella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Seung Eun YiLayer6 AI, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Vinyas HarishDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jahir GutierrezLayer6 AI, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mathieu RavautSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Kathy KornasDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tristan WatsonDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tomi PoutanenLayer6 AI, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Marzyeh GhassemiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Maksims VolkovsLayer6 AI, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Laura C RosellaDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada laura.rosella@utoronto.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-4867-869X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo predict older adults' risk of avoidable hospitalisation related to ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) using machine learning applied to administrative health data of Ontario, Canada. DESIGN, SETTING AND

participantsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on a large cohort of all residents covered under a single-payer system in Ontario, Canada over the period of 10 years (2008-2017). The study included 1.85 million Ontario residents between 65 and 74 years old at any time throughout the study period. DATA SOURCES: Administrative health data from Ontario, Canada obtained from the (ICES formely known as the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Data Repository.

main outcome measuresRisk of hospitalisations due to ACSCs 1 year after the observation period.

resultsThe study used a total of 1 854 116 patients, split into train, validation and test sets. The ACSC incidence rates among the data points were 1.1% for all sets. The final XGBoost model achieved an area under the receiver operating curve of 80.5% and an area under precision-recall curve of 0.093 on the test set, and the predictions were well calibrated, including in key subgroups. When ranking the model predictions, those at the top 5% of risk as predicted by the model captured 37.4% of those presented with an ACSC-related hospitalisation. A variety of features such as the previous number of ambulatory care visits, presence of ACSC-related hospitalisations during the observation window, age, rural residence and prescription of certain medications were contributors to the prediction. Our model was also able to capture the geospatial heterogeneity of ACSC risk in Ontario, and especially the elevated risk in rural and marginalised regions.

conclusionsThis study aimed to predict the 1-year risk of hospitalisation from ambulatory-care sensitive conditions in seniors aged 65-74 years old with a single, large-scale machine learning model. The model shows the potential to inform population health planning and interventions to reduce the burden of ACSC-related hospitalisations.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care Sensitive ConditionsPopulation HealthAgedCohort StudiesHospitalizationHumansMachine LearningOntarioRetrospective Studieshealth policypublic healthquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID35365510
PMCPMC8977821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.