Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35365508›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2022

How the reduction of working hours could influence health outcomes: a systematic review of published studies.

Gianluca Voglino, Armando Savatteri, Maria Rosaria Gualano, Dario Catozzi, Stefano Rousset, Edoardo Boietti, Fabrizio Bert, Roberta Siliquini

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Working hours and health - key research topics in the past and future.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gianluca VoglinoDepartment of Public Health and Paediatric Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5516-3419
Armando SavatteriDepartment of Public Health and Paediatric Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
Maria Rosaria GualanoDepartment of Public Health and Paediatric Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy mariarosaria.gualano@unito.it.ORCID 0000-0001-7357-2892
Dario CatozziDepartment of Public Health and Paediatric Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
Stefano RoussetDepartment of Public Health and Paediatric Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
Edoardo BoiettiDepartment of Public Health and Paediatric Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
Fabrizio BertDepartment of Public Health and Paediatric Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
Roberta SiliquiniDepartment of Public Health and Paediatric Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe health effects of work-time arrangements have been largely studied for long working hours, whereas a lack of knowledge remains regarding the potential health impact of reduced work-time interventions. Therefore, we conducted this review in order to assess the relationships between work-time reduction and health outcomes.

designSystematic review of published studies. Medline, PsycINFO, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched from January 2000 up to November 2019. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was the impact of reduced working time with retained salary on health effects, interventional and observational studies providing a quantitative analysis of any health-related outcome were included. Studies with qualitative research methods were excluded.

resultsA total of 3876 published articles were identified and 7 studies were selected for the final analysis, all with a longitudinal interventional design. The sample size ranged from 63 participants to 580 workers, mostly from healthcare settings. Two studies assessed a work-time reduction to 6 hours per day; two studies evaluated a weekly work-time reduction of 25%; two studies evaluated simultaneously a reduced weekly work-time reduction proportionally to the amount of time worked and a 2.5 hours of physical activity programme per week instead of work time; one study assessed a reduced weekly work-time reduction from 39 to 30 hours per week. A positive relationship between reduced working hours and working life quality, sleep and stress was observed. It is unclear whether work time reduction determined an improvement in general health outcomes, such as self-perceived health and well-being.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that the reduction of working hours with retained salary could be an effective workplace intervention for the improvement of employees' well-being, especially regarding stress and sleep. Further studies in different contexts are needed to better evaluate the impact of work-time reduction on other health outcomes.

Indexed as

Personnel Staffing and SchedulingHumansSleepStress, Psychologicalhealth policyhealth & safetyoccupational & industrial medicinepublic health

Identifiers

PMID35365508
PMCPMC8977802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.