Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35365505›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Validating a Computational Framework for Ionic Electrodiffusion with Cortical Spreading Depression as a Case Study.

Ada J Ellingsrud, Didrik B Dukefoss, Rune Enger, Geir Halnes, Klas Pettersen, Marie E Rognes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ada J EllingsrudDepartment for Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing, Simula Research Laboratory, Oslo 0164, Norway ada@simula.no.
Didrik B DukefossLetten Centre, Division of Anatomy, Department of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo 0317, Norway.
Rune EngerLetten Centre, Division of Anatomy, Department of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo 0317, Norway.
Geir HalnesCINPLA, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo 0316, Norway.
Klas PettersenNORA, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo 0316, Norway.
Marie E RognesDepartment for Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing, Simula Research Laboratory, Oslo 0164, Norway.
University of Oslo · NOSimula Research Laboratory · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cortical spreading depression (CSD) is a wave of pronounced depolarization of brain tissue accompanied by substantial shifts in ionic concentrations and cellular swelling. Here, we validate a computational framework for modeling electrical potentials, ionic movement, and cellular swelling in brain tissue during CSD. We consider different model variations representing wild-type (WT) or knock-out/knock-down mice and systematically compare the numerical results with reports from a selection of experimental studies. We find that the data for several CSD hallmarks obtained computationally, including wave propagation speed, direct current shift duration, peak in extracellular K

Indexed as

Cortical Spreading DepressionAnimalsBrainExtracellular SpaceMicecomputational modellingcortical spreading depressionionic electrodiffusion and osmosisvalidation

Identifiers

PMID35365505
PMCPMC9045477
OpenAlexW4225256665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.