Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35365495›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie

Hip arthroscopy utilization and reoperation rates in Ontario: a population-based analysis comparing different age cohorts.

Ryan M Degen, J Andrew McClure, Britney Le, Blayne Welk, Brent Lanting, Jacquelyn D Marsh

Open access · diamondAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Limited clinical utility of a machine learning revision prediction model based on a national hip arthroscopy registry.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
  7. What the papers say.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ryan M DegenFrom the Bone and Joint Institute, Western University, London, Ont. (Degen, Lanting, Marsh); the Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, London, Ont. (Degen); ICES Western, London, Ont. (McClure, Le, Welk, Marsh); the Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ont. (Degen, Welk, Lanting); and the Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Ont. (Marsh) ryan.degen@gmail.com.
J Andrew McClureFrom the Bone and Joint Institute, Western University, London, Ont. (Degen, Lanting, Marsh); the Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, London, Ont. (Degen); ICES Western, London, Ont. (McClure, Le, Welk, Marsh); the Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ont. (Degen, Welk, Lanting); and the Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Ont. (Marsh).
Britney LeFrom the Bone and Joint Institute, Western University, London, Ont. (Degen, Lanting, Marsh); the Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, London, Ont. (Degen); ICES Western, London, Ont. (McClure, Le, Welk, Marsh); the Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ont. (Degen, Welk, Lanting); and the Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Ont. (Marsh).
Blayne WelkFrom the Bone and Joint Institute, Western University, London, Ont. (Degen, Lanting, Marsh); the Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, London, Ont. (Degen); ICES Western, London, Ont. (McClure, Le, Welk, Marsh); the Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ont. (Degen, Welk, Lanting); and the Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Ont. (Marsh).
Brent LantingFrom the Bone and Joint Institute, Western University, London, Ont. (Degen, Lanting, Marsh); the Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, London, Ont. (Degen); ICES Western, London, Ont. (McClure, Le, Welk, Marsh); the Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ont. (Degen, Welk, Lanting); and the Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Ont. (Marsh).
Jacquelyn D MarshFrom the Bone and Joint Institute, Western University, London, Ont. (Degen, Lanting, Marsh); the Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, London, Ont. (Degen); ICES Western, London, Ont. (McClure, Le, Welk, Marsh); the Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ont. (Degen, Welk, Lanting); and the Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Ont. (Marsh).
Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder age (> 40 yr) and osteoarthritis are negative prognostic variables for hip arthroscopy, but their impact has not been quantified from a population standpoint. The purpose of this study was to perform a population-based analysis of hip arthroscopy utilization and associated 2- and 5-year reoperation rates and complications in different age cohorts.

methodsAdministrative databases from Ontario, Canada, were retrospectively reviewed to identify patients aged 18-60 years who underwent hip arthroscopy between 2006 and 2016. Patients were stratified into 2 cohorts: 18-39 and 40-60 years of age. Patients were followed for 2 and 5 years to capture the occurrence of subsequent surgery (repeat arthroscopy or total hip arthroplasty) and postoperative complications.

resultsA total of 1906 patients underwent hip arthroscopy, 818 (42.9%) of whom were aged 40-60 years. In the entire cohort, revision surgery occurred in 6.5% and 15.1% of cases at 2 and 5 years, respectively. Revision surgery rates were significantly higher among patients aged 40-60 years at 2 (10.8% v. 3.2%,

conclusionRevision surgery rates following hip arthroscopy are significantly higher among older patients and those with concomitant osteoarthritis. Although the data have limitations, they provide useful information to guide surgical decision-making.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroscopyAdolescentAdultHumansMiddle AgedOntarioReoperationRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID35365495
PMCPMC8979656
OpenAlexW4220838452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.