Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35365407›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA

Rates and correlates of medicine disposal program implementation at pharmacies in North Carolina: A longitudinal study, 2016-2021.

Kathleen L Egan, Carol A Johnston, Jeffrey T Jackson, Samantha E Foster, Joseph G L Lee

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Opioid use, prescribing patterns, and disposal after surgical procedures.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024
    Article
  8. Drug disposal deserts: An assessment of receptacle availability in Kentucky community pharmacies.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kathleen L Egan
Carol A Johnston
Jeffrey T Jackson
Samantha E Foster
Joseph G L Lee

Funding

Development and Pilot Randomized Control Trial of a Text Message Intervention to Facilitate Secure Storage and Disposal of Prescription Opioids to Prevent Diversion and MisuseR34DA051710 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI EGAN, KATHLEEN LOUISE · 2021 to 2023
$699k
NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA051710
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnused prescription opioids from family and friends continue to be the primary access point to prescription opioids for nonmedical use among youth. Implementation of medicine disposal boxes at pharmacies is one approach to facilitate removal of unused prescription opioids from the home to prevent diversion.

objectivesWe sought to examine the implementation rates of disposal boxes at pharmacies in North Carolina from 2016 to 2021 and place-based health disparities in availability.

methodsWe identified pharmacies with a disposal box in 2016, 2018, and 2021 among licensed pharmacies in North Carolina in 2018 (N = 2587). We computed descriptive statistics to describe disposal box implementation rates over time and used geographic information systems to identify spatial trends. We used separate logistic regression models in 2018 and 2021 to assess the relationship between neighborhood characteristics and the likelihood of a pharmacy implementing a disposal box.

resultsWe found an increase in disposal boxes over time with 43 pharmacies (1.7%) in 2016, 144 (5.6%) in 2018, and 350 (13.5%) in 2021 implementing a disposal box. In 2018, independent pharmacies were more likely than chains to have a disposal box. In 2021, medical-affiliated and pharmacies defined as "other" were less likely than chains to have a disposal box. In both 2018 and 2021, pharmacies in census tracts with a higher percentage of the population below the federal poverty line were more likely to have a disposal box. In 2021, pharmacies in tracts with a higher percentage of the population unemployed were less likely to have a disposal box. In 2018, pharmacies located in counties with a greater number of opioid overdose deaths were more likely to have a disposal box.

conclusionOur findings highlight the growth of disposal boxes in North Carolina over time and the potential for continued expansion to provide opportunities to prevent prescription opioid diversion.

Indexed as

PharmaciesAdolescentAnalgesics, OpioidHumansLongitudinal StudiesNorth CarolinaAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID35365407
PMCPMC9271542
OpenAlexW4220964092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.