Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35365355›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Medical Association2022

"Community engagement via restorative justice to build equity-oriented crisis standards of care".

Ruby Long, Emily C Cleveland Manchanda, Annette M Dekker, Liliya Kraynov, Susan Willson, Pedro Flores, Elizabeth A Samuels, Karin Rhodes

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Medical Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Ruby LongDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States. Electronic address: rulong@mcw.edu.
Emily C Cleveland ManchandaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Annette M DekkerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Liliya KraynovDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Susan WillsonTogether Works Restorative Consulting, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Pedro FloresUniversity San Diego School of Leadership and Educational Sciences, San Diego, CA, United States.
Elizabeth A SamuelsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Karin RhodesDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Donald & Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, United States.
Boston University · USBrown University · USDonald & Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USOregon Health & Science University · USTogether · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) Pandemic has revealed multiple structural inequities within the United States (US), with high social vulnerability index communities shouldering the brunt of death and disability of this pandemic. BIPOC/Latinx people have undergone hospitalizations and death at magnitudes greater than White people in the US. The untold second casualties are health care workers that are suffering from increased risk of infection, death, and mental health crisis. Many health care workers are abandoning the profession all together. Although Crisis Standards of Care (CSC) mean to guide the ethical allocation of scare resources, they frequently use scoring systems that are inherently biased. This raises concern for the application of equity in CSC. Data examining the impact of these protocols on health equity is scarce. Structural maltreatment in healthcare and inequities have led to cumulative harms, physiologic weathering and structural adversities for residents of the US. We propose the use of Restorative Justice (RJ) practices to develop CSC rooted in inclusion and equity. The RJ framework utilizes capacity building, circle process, and conferences to convene groups in a respectful environment for dialogue, healing, accountability, and action plan creation. A phased, non-faith-based facilitated RJ approach for CSC development (or revision) that fosters ethically equitable resource distribution, authentic community engagement, and accountability is shared. This opportunity for local, inclusive decision making and problem solving will both reflect the needs and give agency to community members while supporting the dismantling of structural racism and oppressive, exclusive policies. The authors are asking legislative and health system policy makers to adopt Restorative Justice practices for Crisis Standards of Care development. The US cannot afford to have additional reductions in inhabitant lifespan or the talent pool within healthcare.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2HumansPandemicsSocial JusticeStandard of CareUnited StatesCommunity engagementDisparitiesEthics in times of crisisPolicy

Identifiers

PMID35365355
PMCPMC8963696
OpenAlexW4220882100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.