Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35365220›Full record

ArticleBiological research2022

Sperm DNA damage compromises embryo development, but not oocyte fertilisation in pigs.

Yentel Mateo-Otero, Marc Llavanera, Sandra Recuero, Ariadna Delgado-Bermúdez, Isabel Barranco, Jordi Ribas-Maynou, Marc Yeste

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sperm quality andFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yentel Mateo-OteroBiotechnology of Animal and Human Reproduction (TechnoSperm), Institute of Food and Agricultural Technology, University of Girona, S17003, Girona, Spain.
Marc LlavaneraBiotechnology of Animal and Human Reproduction (TechnoSperm), Institute of Food and Agricultural Technology, University of Girona, S17003, Girona, Spain.
Sandra RecueroBiotechnology of Animal and Human Reproduction (TechnoSperm), Institute of Food and Agricultural Technology, University of Girona, S17003, Girona, Spain.
Ariadna Delgado-BermúdezBiotechnology of Animal and Human Reproduction (TechnoSperm), Institute of Food and Agricultural Technology, University of Girona, S17003, Girona, Spain.
Isabel BarrancoDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Via Tolara di Sopra 50, Ozzano dell'Emilia, T40064, Bologna, Italy.
Jordi Ribas-Maynou *Biotechnology of Animal and Human Reproduction (TechnoSperm), Institute of Food and Agricultural Technology, University of Girona, S17003, Girona, Spain. jordi.ribasmaynou@udg.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9101-2044
Marc Yeste *Biotechnology of Animal and Human Reproduction (TechnoSperm), Institute of Food and Agricultural Technology, University of Girona, S17003, Girona, Spain. marc.yeste@udg.edu.
Universitat de Girona · ESInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ESUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

Fundació la Marató de TV3 214/857-202039Generalitat de Catalunya 2017-SGR-1229Generalitat de Catalunya 2020-FI-B-00412H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions Tecniospring INDUSTRYH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions TECSPR-19-1-0003Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades AGL2017-88329-RMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades FJCI-2017-31689
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe assessment of sperm DNA integrity has been proposed as a complementary test to conventional mammalian semen analysis. In this sense, single-strand (SSB) and double-strand (DSB) DNA breaks, the two types of sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF), have been reported to have different aetiologies and to be associated to different fertility outcomes in bovine and humans. Considering that no studies in porcine have addressed how SDF may affect sperm quality and fertility outcomes, the present work aimed to determine the impact of global DNA damage, SSB and DSB on sperm quality and in vitro fertilising ability. To this end, 24 ejaculates (one per boar) were split into three aliquots: the first was used to assess sperm quality parameters through a computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) system and flow cytometry; the second was used to perform in vitro fertilisation, and the third, to evaluate sperm DNA integrity using alkaline and neutral Comet assays.

resultsThe results showed that global DNA damage negatively correlates (P < 0.05) with normal sperm morphology (R = - 0.460) and progressive motility (R = - 0.419), and positively with the percentage of non-viable sperm (R = 0.507). Multiple regression analyses showed that non-viable sperm were related to SSB (β = - 0.754). In addition, while fertilisation did not seem to be affected by sperm DNA integrity, global DNA damage, DSB and SSB were found to be correlated to embryo development outcomes. Specifically, whereas global DNA damage and DSB negatively affected (P < 0.05) the later preimplantation embryo stages (percentage of early blastocyst/blastocyst D6: for global DNA damage, R = - 0.458, and for DSB, R = - 0.551; and percentage of hatching/hatched blastocyst D6: for global DNA damage, R = - 0.505, and for DSB, R = - 0.447), global DNA damage and SSB had a negative impact (P < 0.05) on the developmental competency of fertilised embryos (R = - 0.532 and R = - 0.515, respectively). Remarkably, multiple regression analyses supported the associations found in correlation analyses. Finally, the present work also found that the inclusion of Comet assays to the conventional sperm quality tests improves the prediction of blastocyst formation (AUC = 0.9021, P < 0.05), but not fertilisation rates (P > 0.05).

conclusionConsidering all these findings, this work sets a useful model to study how SDF negatively influences fertility.

Indexed as

DNA DamageSpermatozoaAnimalsCattleDNA FragmentationEmbryonic DevelopmentFertilizationMaleMammalsSwineEmbryo developmentOocyte fertilisationPorcineSperm DNA damage

Identifiers

PMID35365220
PMCPMC8973803
OpenAlexW4220821794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.