Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35365217›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2022

Surveillance of Enterobacter cloacae complex colonization and comparative analysis of different typing methods on a neonatal intensive care unit in Germany.

Andreas F Wendel, Daniel Peter, Frauke Mattner, Michael Weiss, Marc Hoppenz, Sophia Wolf, Baris Bader, Silke Peter, Jan Liese

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Clonal diversity ofIJID regions · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Genomic characterization ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Enterobacter cloacae complex taxonomic incongruence may lead to misidentification of outbreaks and hinder infection control in real time.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Bloodstream infection with NDM-1/5Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Genomic Study of High-Risk Clones ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas F Wendel *Institute of Hygiene, Cologne Merheim Medical Centre, University Hospital of Witten/Herdecke, Ostmerheimer Strasse 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany. wendela@kliniken-koeln.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2160-4220
Daniel Peter *Institute of Hygiene, Cologne Merheim Medical Centre, University Hospital of Witten/Herdecke, Ostmerheimer Strasse 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
Frauke MattnerInstitute of Hygiene, Cologne Merheim Medical Centre, University Hospital of Witten/Herdecke, Ostmerheimer Strasse 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
Michael WeissDepartment of Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine, Children's Hospital, Cologne, Germany.
Marc HoppenzDepartment of Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine, Children's Hospital, Cologne, Germany.
Sophia WolfInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Baris BaderInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Silke PeterInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Jan LieseInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1717-3517
German Center for Infection Research · DEWitten/Herdecke University · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnterobacter cloacae complex is a group of common opportunistic pathogens on neonatal intensive care units. Active microbiological screening to guide empirical antimicrobial treatment or to detect transmission events is recommended in high-risk preterm neonates. A rise in colonization with E. cloacae complex was observed in a German perinatal centre. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of different typing techniques using whole genome sequencing (WGS) as a reference.

methodsEnterobacter cloacae complex isolates from clinical and screening specimens with an epidemiological link to the neonatal intensive care units were further assessed. Identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed by a combination of VITEK2 (bioMérieux) and MALDI-TOF (Bruker Daltonics), followed by RAPD/rep-PCR and PFGE (XbaI). Retrospectively, all isolates were analyzed by Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (IR Biotyper, Bruker Daltonics). Whole genome sequencing with SNP-based clustering was used as the reference method. Furthermore, resistome analysis, sequence type and species identification were derived from the WGS data. Transmission analysis was based on epidemiological and typing data.

resultsBetween September 2017 and March 2018 32 mostly preterm neonates were found to be colonized with E. cloacae complex and 32 isolates from 24 patients were available for further typing. RAPD/rep-PCR and PFGE showed good concordance with WGS whereas FTIR displayed mediocre results [adjusted rand index (ARI) = 0.436]. A polyclonal increase and two dominant and overlapping clonal clusters of two different E. hormaechei subspecies were detected. Overall, four different species were identified. Genotyping confirmed third-generation cephalosporin resistance development in isolates of the same patient. During the six-month period several infection prevention interventions were performed and no E. cloacae complex isolates were observed during the following months.

conclusionsInterpretation of the microbiological results alone to detect transmission events is often challenging and bacterial typing is of utmost importance to implement targeted infection control measures in an epidemic occurrence of E. cloacae complex. WGS is the most discriminatory method. However, traditional methods such as PFGE or RAPD/rep-PCR can provide reliable and quicker results in many settings. Furthermore, research is needed to quickly identify E. cloacae complex to the species level in the microbiological laboratory.

Indexed as

Cross InfectionEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsDisease OutbreaksEnterobacter cloacaeHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalRandom Amplified Polymorphic DNA TechniqueRetrospective StudiesBacterial typingE. cloacae complexNeonatal colonization screeningNeonatal intensive care unit

Identifiers

PMID35365217
PMCPMC8973561
OpenAlexW4221036283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.