Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35365200›Full record

ArticleItalian journal of pediatrics2022

How we teach children with asthma to use their inhaler: a scoping review.

Patrick McCrossan, Orla Mallon, Michael D Shields, Catherine Russell, Lesley Kennedy, Dara O'Donoghue

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Patrick McCrossanDepartment of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children, Belfast, UK. p.mccrossan@qub.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5242-4866
Orla MallonSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast , Belfast, UK.
Michael D ShieldsDepartment of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children, Belfast, UK.
Catherine RussellDepartment of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children, Belfast, UK.
Lesley KennedyDepartment of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children, Belfast, UK.
Dara O'DonoghueDepartment of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children, Belfast, UK.
Queen's University Belfast · GBRoyal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne reason that asthma remains poorly controlled in children is poor inhaler technique. Guidelines recommend checking inhaler technique at each clinical visit. However, they do not specify how best to train children to mastery of correct inhaler technique. Many children are simply shown how to use inhalers which results in less than 50% with correct inhaler technique. The aim of this scoping review is to explore published literature on teaching methods used to train children to master correct inhaler technique.

methodsWe searched (from inception onwards): Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL and the Cochrane library. We included quantitative studies, (e.g. randomised controlled trials, cohort studies and case-control studies), published from 1956 to present, on teaching inhaler technique to children with asthma. Data was extracted onto a data charting table to create a descriptive summary of the results. Data was then synthesised with descriptive statistics and visual mapping.

resultsThirty-three papers were identified for full text analysis. Educational interventions were found to be taking place in a variety of clinical areas and by a range of healthcare professional disciplines. 'Brief-Instruction' and 'Teach-Back' were identified as two primary methods of providing inhaler technique training in the majority of papers. Secondary themes identified were; use of written instruction, physical demonstration, video demonstrations and/or use of inhaler devices to augment inhaler technique training.

conclusionThere are a variety of means by which inhaler technique has been taught to children. These methods are likely applicable to all inhaler types and often involve some form of physical demonstration. Children of all ages can be trained to use their inhaler correctly and by a range of healthcare professionals. We have not analysed the effectiveness of these different interventions, but have described what has been trialled before in an attempt to focus our attentions on what may potentially work best. The majority of these methods can be dichotomised to either 'Brief-Intervention' or 'Teach-Back'. Based on our analysis of this scoping review, we consider the following as areas for future research; how many times does a given intervention have to be done in order to have the desired effect? For what duration does the intervention need to continue to have a long-lasting effect? And, what is the best outcome measure for inhaler technique?.

trial registrationSystematic review registration: Open Science Framework (osf.io/n7kcw).

Indexed as

Anti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaCase-Control StudiesChildHumansNebulizers and VaporizersAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaChildrenInhalerPaediatricsTechnique

Identifiers

PMID35365200
PMCPMC8972732
OpenAlexW4226147314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.