Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35365170›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2022

Dosimetric feasibility of moderately hypofractionated/dose escalated radiation therapy for localised prostate cancer with intensity-modulated proton beam therapy using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB-IMPT) and impact of hydrogel prostate-rectum spacer.

Dalia Ahmad Khalil, Danny Jazmati, Dirk Geismar, Jörg Wulff, Christian Bäumer, Paul Heinz Kramer, Theresa Steinmeier, Stefanie Schulze Schleitthoff, Sandija Plaude, Martin Bischoff and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dalia Ahmad KhalilDepartment of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Center (WTZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Danny JazmatiDepartment of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Center (WTZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany. Danny.Jazmati@uk-essen.de.
Dirk GeismarDepartment of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Center (WTZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Jörg WulffDepartment of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Center (WTZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Christian BäumerDepartment of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Center (WTZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Paul Heinz KramerDepartment of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Center (WTZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Theresa SteinmeierDepartment of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Center (WTZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Stefanie Schulze SchleitthoffDepartment of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Center (WTZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Sandija PlaudeDepartment of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Center (WTZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Martin BischoffDepartment of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Center (WTZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Stephan TschirdewahnDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Boris HadaschikDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Beate TimmermannDepartment of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Center (WTZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Deutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine the dosimetric feasibility of hypofractionated/dose escalated radiation therapy in patients with localized prostate carcinoma using simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated proton beam therapy (SIB-IMPT) in absence or presence of prostate-rectum spacer.

methodsIMPT technique was implemented in 23 patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer treated at West German Proton Therapy Centre from March 2016 till June 2018, using SIB technique prescribing 60 GyRBE and 72 GyRBE in 30 fractions to PTV1 (prostate and seminal vesicle) and PTV2 boost (prostate and proximal seminal vesicle), respectively. In 15 patients, a transperineal injection of hydrogel was applied prior to radiotherapy to increase the distance between prostate and rectum. Planning and all treatments were performed with a 120 ml fluid-filled endorectal balloon customised daily for each patient. For each patient, 2 lateral IMPT beams were implemented taking a field-specific range uncertainty (RU) into account. Dose volume histograms (DVH) were analyzed for PTV2, PTV2 with range uncertainty margin (PTV2RU), rectum, bladder, right/left femoral heads, and penile bulb. For late rectal toxicities, the normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) were calculated using different biological models. A DVH- and NTCP-based dosimetric comparison was carried out between non-spacer and spacer groups.

resultsFor the 23 patients, high-quality plans could be achieved for target volume and for other organs at risk (OARs). For PTV2, the V

conclusionHypofractionated/dose escalated radiotherapy with SIB-IMPT is dosimetrically feasible. Further reduction of the rectal volumes receiving high and medium dose levels (73-50 Gy) and rectal NTCP could be achieved through injection of spacers between rectum and prostate.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsProton TherapyFeasibility StudiesHumansHydrogelsMaleProstateRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRectumHydrogelsHydrogel prostate-rectum spacersIntensity-modulated therapyProstate cancerProton therapySimultaneous integrated boost

Identifiers

PMID35365170
PMCPMC8973648
OpenAlexW4226133984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.