Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35365098›Full record

ArticleMolecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.)2022

Combined miRNA and SERS urine liquid biopsy for the point-of-care diagnosis and molecular stratification of bladder cancer.

Tudor Moisoiu, Mihnea P Dragomir, Stefania D Iancu, Simon Schallenberg, Giovanni Birolo, Giulio Ferrero, Dan Burghelea, Andrei Stefancu, Ramona G Cozan, Emilia Licarete and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Urinary MicroRNAs as Biomarkers of Urological Cancers: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Liquid biopsies in cancer.Molecular biomedicine · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Advances in applications of artificial intelligence algorithms for cancer-related miRNA research.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Epigenetic and Immunological Features of Bladder Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Tudor Moisoiu *Clinical Institute of Urology and Renal Transplantation, 400006, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Mihnea P Dragomir *Institute of Pathology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany. mihnea.dragomir@charite.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5550-3516
Stefania D Iancu *Faculty of Physics, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400084, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Simon SchallenbergInstitute of Pathology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Giovanni BiroloDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Giulio FerreroDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Regione Gonzole, 10, 10043, Orbassano, Italy.
Dan BurgheleaClinical Institute of Urology and Renal Transplantation, 400006, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Andrei StefancuFaculty of Physics, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400084, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Ramona G CozanFaculty of Physics, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400084, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Emilia LicareteFaculty of Biology, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400015, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Alessandra AllioneDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Giuseppe MatulloDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Gheorghita IacobClinical Institute of Urology and Renal Transplantation, 400006, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Zoltán BálintFaculty of Physics, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400084, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Radu I BadeaIuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Alessio NaccaratiCandiolo Cancer Institute-FPO IRCCS, 10060, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
David HorstInstitute of Pathology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Barbara PardiniCandiolo Cancer Institute-FPO IRCCS, 10060, Candiolo, Turin, Italy. barbara.pardini@iigm.it.
Nicolae LeopoldBiomed Data Analytics SRL, 400696, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. nicolae.leopold@ubbcluj.ro.
Florin ElecClinical Institute of Urology and Renal Transplantation, 400006, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. ioan.elec@umfcluj.ro.
Babeș-Bolyai University · ROIuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROUniversity of Turin · ITGerman Cancer Research Center · DEItalian institute for Genomic Medicine · ITHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBladder cancer (BC) has the highest per-patient cost of all cancer types. Hence, we aim to develop a non-invasive, point-of-care tool for the diagnostic and molecular stratification of patients with BC based on combined microRNAs (miRNAs) and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) profiling of urine.

methodsNext-generation sequencing of the whole miRNome and SERS profiling were performed on urine samples collected from 15 patients with BC and 16 control subjects (CTRLs). A retrospective cohort (BC = 66 and CTRL = 50) and RT-qPCR were used to confirm the selected differently expressed miRNAs. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using machine learning algorithms (logistic regression, naïve Bayes, and random forest), which were trained to discriminate between BC and CTRL, using as input either miRNAs, SERS, or both. The molecular stratification of BC based on miRNA and SERS profiling was performed to discriminate between high-grade and low-grade tumors and between luminal and basal types.

resultsCombining SERS data with three differentially expressed miRNAs (miR-34a-5p, miR-205-3p, miR-210-3p) yielded an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.92 ± 0.06 in discriminating between BC and CTRL, an accuracy which was superior either to miRNAs (AUC = 0.84 ± 0.03) or SERS data (AUC = 0.84 ± 0.05) individually. When evaluating the classification accuracy for luminal and basal BC, the combination of miRNAs and SERS profiling averaged an AUC of 0.95 ± 0.03 across the three machine learning algorithms, again better than miRNA (AUC = 0.89 ± 0.04) or SERS (AUC = 0.92 ± 0.05) individually, although SERS alone performed better in terms of classification accuracy.

conclusionmiRNA profiling synergizes with SERS profiling for point-of-care diagnostic and molecular stratification of BC. By combining the two liquid biopsy methods, a clinically relevant tool that can aid BC patients is envisaged.

Indexed as

MicroRNAsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsBayes TheoremBiomarkers, TumorHumansLiquid BiopsyPoint-of-Care SystemsRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsBiomarkersBladder cancerLiquid biopsymicroRNAMolecular subtypesSERS

Identifiers

PMID35365098
PMCPMC8973824
OpenAlexW4220692592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.