ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2022
Stimulus context affects the phonemic categorization of temporally based word contrasts in adult cochlear-implant users.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spectral cues influence perception of voice onset time when using the /ɑ/ vowel: Pitfalls and solutionsa).The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025Article
- Temporal speech cue perception in listeners with cochlear implants depends on the time between those cues and previous sound energy.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- Spectral degradation and carrier sentences increase age-related temporal processing deficits in a cue-specific manner.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cochlear-implant (CI) users rely heavily on temporal envelope cues for speech understanding. This study examined whether their sensitivity to temporal cues in word segments is affected when the words are preceded by non-informative carrier sentences. Thirteen adult CI users performed phonemic categorization tasks that present primarily temporally based word contrasts: Buy-Pie contrast with word-initial stop of varying voice-onset time (VOT), and Dish-Ditch contrast with varying silent intervals preceding the word-final fricative. These words were presented in isolation or were preceded by carrier stimuli including a sentence, a sentence-envelope-modulated noise, or an unmodulated speech-shaped noise. While participants were able to categorize both word contrasts, stimulus context effects were observed primarily for the Buy-Pie contrast, such that participants reported more "Buy" responses for words with longer VOTs in conditions with carrier stimuli than in isolation. The two non-speech carrier stimuli yielded similar or even greater context effects than sentences. The context effects disappeared when target words were delayed from the carrier stimuli for ≥75 ms. These results suggest that stimulus contexts affect auditory temporal processing in CI users but the context effects appear to be cue-specific. The context effects may be governed by general auditory processes, not those specific to speech processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.