Observational studyTranslational stroke research2023
Is the Human Touch Always Therapeutic? Patient Stimulation and Spreading Depolarization after Acute Neurological Injuries.
Observational study in Translational stroke research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cerebral Autoregulation in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Source of Index, Timing, and Relationship to Spreading Depolarization.Journal of neurotrauma · 2026Article
- Initiation site of experimentally-evoked spreading depolarizations influence tissue outcomes in a murine stroke model.Experimental neurology · 2026Article
- Initiation site of experimentally-evoked spreading depolarizations influence tissue outcomes in a murine stroke model.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Depth-Specific Hypoxic Responses to Spreading Depolarizations in Gyrencephalic Swine Cortex Unveiled by Photoacoustic Imaging.Translational stroke research · 2025Article
- Oxygen-Based Autoregulation Indices Associated with Clinical Outcomes and Spreading Depolarization in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.Neurocritical care · 2025Observational
- Cerebral autoregulation, spreading depolarization, and implications for targeted therapy in brain injury and ischemia.Reviews in the neurosciences · 2024Review
- Management Strategies Based on Multi-Modality Neuromonitoring in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023Review
- GluA1-Shank3 interaction decreases in response to chronic neuronal depolarization.Neuroscience letters · 2023Article
- Spreading Depolarization as a Therapeutic Target in Severe Ischemic Stroke: Physiological and Pharmacological Strategies.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Touch and other types of patient stimulation are necessary in critical care and generally presumed to be beneficial. Recent pre-clinical studies as well as randomized trials assessing early mobilization have challenged the safety of such routine practices in patients with acute neurological injury such as stroke. We sought to determine whether patient stimulation could result in spreading depolarization (SD), a dramatic pathophysiological event that likely contributes to metabolic stress and ischemic expansion in such patients. Patients undergoing surgical intervention for severe acute neurological injuries (stroke, aneurysm rupture, or trauma) were prospectively consented and enrolled in an observational study monitoring SD with implanted subdural electrodes. Subjects also underwent simultaneous video recordings (from continuous EEG monitoring) to assess for physical touch and other forms of patient stimulation (such as suctioning and positioning). The association of patient stimulation with subsequent SD was assessed. Increased frequency of patient stimulation was associated with increased risk of SD (OR = 4.39 [95%CI = 1.71-11.24]). The overall risk of SD was also increased in the 60 min following patient stimulation compared to times with no stimulation (OR = 1.19 [95%CI = 1.13-1.26]), though not all subjects demonstrated this effect individually. Positioning of the subject was the subtype of stimulation with the strongest overall effect on SD (OR = 4.92 [95%CI = 3.74-6.47]). We conclude that in patients with some acute neurological injuries, touch and other patient stimulation can induce SD (PS-SD), potentially increasing the risk of metabolic and ischemic stress. PS-SD may represent an underlying mechanism for observed increased risk of early mobilization in such patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.