ArticleCJEM2022
Parental perspectives on the transfer process for critically ill children.
Article in CJEM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- State-of-the-art management of the acutely unwell child.Anaesthesia · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo understand parental stressors and identify potential stress-mitigators during interfacility transfer of critically ill children.
methodsDescriptive qualitative multi-case study using semi-structured interviews. This study involved caregivers of patients admitted to the Paediatric Critical Care Unit at Children's Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre transported from outlying hospitals. Study participants were recruited through purposeful sampling. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and manually de-identified. Coding was performed by two independent coders using a standard method of content analysis to identify common themes.
resultsThemes were identified and reached saturation after twelve interviews were completed. Children were admitted primarily from Northwestern and Southwestern Ontario, at distances ranging from 36 to 1146 km. Sixty-seven percent were transported by ground and 33% were transported by air ambulance. We identified stressors (patient pain and discomfort on transport, separation anxiety, feeling of being uninvolved, general anxiety about transport, cost and logistics of return trip home, lack of support systems/loneliness and leaving other family members behind) and stress-mitigators (parental accompaniment, immediate access to the child at accepting facility, parental involvement in care/comfort, support systems - other families in hospital, support systems - staff, communication with the parents/caregivers and trust toward the transport team) associated with the transport process.
conclusionsThe current study identified important parent perspectives regarding the transfer of critically ill children. We recommend that stakeholders at referral centres, transport services and accepting facilities examine their current standards regarding transport processes to ensure relevant mitigators are incorporated into their programs to improve the transport experience for critically ill children and their families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.