Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35364753›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2022

A pharmacovigilance study of the association between tetracyclines and hepatotoxicity based on Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system data.

Chunyan Wei, Ying Liu, Aidou Jiang, Bin Wu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Tetracycline for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a narrative review from quadruple to dual therapy.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chunyan WeiDepartment of Pharmacy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Ying LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Aidou JiangDepartment of Pharmacy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Bin WuDepartment of Pharmacy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. binw83@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5313-5193
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China NO: 2020YFC2008302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background While tetracycline antibiotics are commonly prescribed in practice, the risk of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains controversial. Aim To evaluate the association of DILI with tetracycline antibiotics. Method All DILI cases of tetracycline antibiotics as primary suspected drugs were extracted from the US Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system (FAERS). The outcomes included severe DILI, hepatocellular injury, cholestatic injury, and liver failure. Disproportionality analyses were conducted by estimating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the information component (IC). Results A total of 1,435 liver injury cases associated with tetracycline antibiotics were identified. The DILI signal was detected in tigecycline, minocycline, and doxycycline. The RORs and the 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of tigecycline, minocycline, and doxycycline were (ROR 5.85, 95% CI 4.96-6.91), (ROR 6.4, 95% CI 5.76-7.11), and (ROR 2.07, 95% CI 1.86-2.31), respectively. Compared to minocycline (ROR 5.5, 95% CI 4.94-6.12; IC 2.35, 95% CI 1.98-2.68) and doxycycline (ROR 1.91, 95% CI 1.71-2.12; IC 0.91, 95% CI 0.55-1.26), tigecycline showed a stronger association with hepatocellular injury (ROR 7.11, 95% CI 6.13-8.23; IC 2.68, 95% CI 2.16-3.13). Tigecycline also showed a stronger association with cholestatic injury (ROR 12.16, 95% CI 10.13-14.61; IC 3.51, 95% CI 2.79-4) than minocycline (ROR 3.23, 95% CI 2.59-4.04; IC 1.67, 95% CI 0.9-2.37) or doxycycline (ROR 2.86, 95% CI 2.47-3.31; IC 1.5, 95% CI 1-1.97). Tigecycline (ROR 6.56, 95% CI 4.57-9.41; IC 2.69, 95% CI 1.28-3.64) and minocycline (ROR 4.22, 95% CI 3.14-5.66; IC 2.06, 95% CI 1-2.93) showed a significant association with liver failure. Conclusion The data mining of FAERS suggested an association between DILI and tigecycline, minocycline, and doxycycline.

Indexed as

Chemical and Drug Induced Liver InjuryDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsLiver FailureAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDoxycyclineHumansMinocyclinePharmacovigilanceTigecyclineUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAnti-Bacterial AgentsDoxycyclineMinocyclineTigecyclineDoxycyclineDrug-induced liver injuryMinocyclinePharmacovigilanceTigecycline

Identifiers

PMID35364753
OpenAlexW4226038195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.