Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35364281›Full record

ArticleInsect biochemistry and molecular biology2022

Mosquito odorant receptor sensitive to natural spatial repellents and inhibitory compounds.

Pingxi Xu, Young-Moo Choo, Sunny An, Gabriel M Leal, Walter S Leal

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insect biochemistry and molecular biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Odorant inhibition in mosquito olfaction mediated by inverse agonists.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pingxi XuDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Young-Moo ChooDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Sunny AnDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Gabriel M LealDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Walter S LealDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. Electronic address: wsleal@ucdavis.edu.
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

Olfactory protein-based screening of oviposition attractants for Culex mosquitoesR01AI095514 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI LEAL, WALTER S · 2012 to 2021
$3.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI095514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previously, we have identified an odorant receptor (OR) from the southern house mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus, CquiOR32, which responded to both odorants (agonists) and inhibitory compounds (antagonists). CquiOR32/CquiOrco-expressing oocytes responded to methyl salicylate and other odorants with inward (regular) currents but gave currents in the reverse direction when challenged with eucalyptol and other inhibitors. To determine whether hitherto unknown ORs show this intrareceptor inhibition, we have now examined two other receptors in the same cluster, CquiOR27 and CquiOR28. We cloned and tested four variants of CquiOR28, but none of the 250 compounds in our panel of odorants, including an Orco ligand candidate (OLC12), elicited inward or upward deflections of the current traces. By contrast, CquiOR27/CquiOrco-expressing oocytes gave robust, dose-dependent inward currents when challenged with γ-octalactone and other odorants. On the other hand, octylamine and other phenolic compounds elicited dose-dependent currents in the reverse direction. When stimulatory and inhibitory compounds were presented in binary mixtures, γ-octalactone-elicited inward currents were attenuated in a dose-dependent manner according to the concentration of octylamine. As part of our chemical ecology approach, we tested the repellency activity of the most potent ligands in the surface landing and feeding assay and a newly reported hand-in cage assay. Protection elicited by γ-octalactone did not differ significantly from that of DEET at the same dose. In the hand-in cage assay, a cream formulation of γ-octalactone showed 97.0 ± 1.3% protection, with 47.6 ± 8.3% and 1.4 ± 0.7% landings per trial in the hands covered with a control and γ-octalactone cream, respectively (N = 8, p = 0.0078, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test).

Indexed as

CulexCulicidaeInsect RepellentsReceptors, OdorantAnimalsOdorantsInsect RepellentsReceptors, OdorantCquiOR27CquiOR32Culex quinquefasciatusγ-decalactoneγ-dodecalactoneγ-octalactone

Identifiers

PMID35364281
PMCPMC10540633
OpenAlexW4225301623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.