Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35363826›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Characterization of locomotor phenotypes in zebrafish larvae requires testing under both light and dark conditions.

Melek Umay Tuz-Sasik, Henrik Boije, Remy Manuel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Plag1 Regulates Sensorimotor Modulation in Zebrafish.International journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Surrogate GPR139 Agonists Reverse Short-Term Startle Habituation Impairment in Larval Zebrafish.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melek Umay Tuz-SasikDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Cell and Neurobiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0906-7477
Henrik BoijeDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Cell and Neurobiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Remy ManuelDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Cell and Neurobiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite growing knowledge, much remains unknown regarding how signaling within neural networks translate into specific behaviors. To pursue this quest, we need better understanding of the behavioral output under different experimental conditions. Zebrafish is a key model to study the relationship between network and behavior and illumination is a factor known to influence behavioral output. By only assessing behavior under dark or light conditions, one might miss behavioral phenotypes exclusive to the neglected illumination setting. Here, we identified locomotor behavior, using different rearing regimes and experimental illumination settings, to showcase the need to assess behavior under both light and dark conditions. Characterization of free-swimming zebrafish larvae, housed under continuous darkness or a day/night cycle, did not reveal behavioral differences; larvae were most active during light conditions. However, larvae housed under a day/night cycle moved a shorter distance, had lower maximum velocity and maximum acceleration during the startle response under light conditions. Next, we explored if we could assess behavior under both dark and light conditions by presenting these conditions in sequence, using the same batch of larvae. Our experiments yielded similar results as observed for naïve larvae: higher activity during light conditions, regardless of order of illumination (i.e. dark-light or light-dark). Finally, we conducted these sequenced illumination conditions in an experimental setting by characterizing behavioral phenotypes in larvae following neuromast ablation. Depending on the illumination during testing, the behavioral phenotype following ablation was characterized differently. In addition, the results indicate that the order in which the light and dark conditions are presented has to be considered, as habituation may occur. Our study adds to existing literature on illumination-related differences in zebrafish behavior and emphasize the need to explore behavioral phenotypes under both light and dark condition to maximize our understanding of how experimental permutations affect behavior.

Indexed as

SwimmingZebrafishAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDarknessLarvaLightPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID35363826
PMCPMC8974968
OpenAlexW4220833004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.