ArticlePloS one2022
RETRACTED: Image-guided procedures in the hybrid operating room: A systematic scoping review.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The use of hybrid operating rooms in neurosurgery, advantages, disadvantages, and future perspectives: a systematic review.Acta neurochirurgica · 2023Pooled it
- Robotic Intraoperative Imaging in Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery: Initial Clinical Experience With a Self-Driving Mobile 3D C-Arm in the First 300 Cases.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2026Article
- [Self-driving, fully motorized C-arm in spinal surgery: a comparative study].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Cost Comparison of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy With and Without Intraoperative Cone-beam Computed Tomography: 18-month Postoperative Analysis.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Retraction: Image-guided procedures in the hybrid operating room: A systematic scoping review.PloS one · 2026Article
- [Patient specific implants and instruments in orthopaedic trauma: 3D prints and implants in perlvic and hip fractures].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Scoring the Clinical Application of a Novel Scale in a Hybrid Operating Room for Neurosurgery.Current medical science · 2025Article
- Transradial catheterization for prone neurosurgical treatment in a hybrid operating room: Technical considerations.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
- Article
- Smart Operating Room in Digestive Surgery: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Innovations in Hybrid Laparoscopic Surgery: Integrating Advanced Technologies for Multidisciplinary Cases.Cureus · 2024Review
- Cone-beam computed tomography image-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for lung nodules in a hybrid operating room: an initial experience.European radiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2026-03-05Compromised Peer Review · Objections by Author(s) ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe shift from open to minimally invasive procedures with growing complexity has increased the demand for advanced intraoperative medical technologies. The hybrid operating room (OR) combines the functionality of a standard OR with fixed advanced imaging systems to facilitate minimally invasive image-guided procedures.
objectiveThis systematic scoping review provides an overview of the use of the hybrid OR over the years, and reports on the encountered advantages and challenges.
methodsWe conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases for studies that described procedures being performed with the aid of 3D imaging in the hybrid OR.
resultsThe search identified 123 studies that described 44 distinct procedures, divided over nine clinical disciplines. The number of studies increased from two in 2010 to 15 in the first five months of 2020. Ninety-nine (80%) of the studies described how 3D imaging was performed in the hybrid OR; 95 (96%) used cone-beam CT; four (4%) used multi-detector CT. Advantages and challenges of the hybrid OR were described in 94 (76%) and 34 (35%) studies, respectively. The most frequently reported advantage of using a hybrid OR is the achievement of more accurate treatment results, whereas elongation of the procedure time is the most important challenge, followed by an increase in radiation dose.
conclusionIn conclusion, the growing number of clinical disciplines that uses the hybrid OR shows its wide functionality. To optimize its use, future comparative studies should be conducted to investigate which procedures really benefit from being performed in the hybrid OR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.