Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35363793›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Mid-range visual deficits after stroke: Prevalence and co-occurrence.

Nikki A Lammers, Nils S Van den Berg, Selma Lugtmeijer, Anouk R Smits, Yair Pinto, Edward H F de Haan, visual brain group

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06067607 (Examining the Effect of Eye Gaze Technology on Children With Cortical Visual Impairment and Its Impact on Occupational Performance), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06067607 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Examining the Effect of Eye Gaze Technology on Children With Cortical Visual Impairment and Its Impact on Occupational Performance

TypeinterventionalSponsorRockhurst UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled10ConditionsCortical/Cerebral Visual Impairment, Cerebral PalsyArmseye gaze technology
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nikki A LammersDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nils S Van den BergDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Selma LugtmeijerDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4864-7391
Anouk R SmitsDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Yair PintoDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Edward H F de HaanDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0312-3674
visual brain group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual deficits are common after stroke and are powerful predictors for the chronic functional outcome. However, while basic visual field and recognition deficits are relatively easy to assess with standardized methods, selective deficits in visual primitives, such as shape or motion, are harder to identify, as they often require a symmetrical bilateral posterior lesion in order to provoke full field deficits. Therefore, we do not know how often they occur. Nevertheless, they can have severe repercussions for daily-life functioning. We aimed to investigate the prevalence and co-occurrence of hemifield "mid-range" visual deficits (i.e. color, shape, location, orientation, correlated motion, contrast, texture and glossiness), using a novel experimental set-up with a gaze-contingent presentation of the stimuli. To this end, a prospective cohort of 220 ischemic (sub)cortical stroke patients and a healthy control group was assessed with this set-up. When comparing performance of patients with controls, the results showed that deficits in motion-perception were most prevalent (26%), followed by color (22%), texture (22%), location (21%), orientation (18%), contrast (14%), shape (14%) and glossiness (13%). 63% of the stroke patients showed one or more mid-range visual deficits. Overlap of deficits was small; they mostly occurred in isolation or co-occurred with only one or two other deficits. To conclude, it was found that deficits in "mid-range" visual functions were very prevalent. These deficits are likely to affect the chronic post-stroke condition. Since we found no strong patterns of co-occurrences, we suggest that an assessment of deficits at this level of visual processing requires screening the full range of visual functions.

Indexed as

StrokeVisual PerceptionHumansPrevalenceProspective StudiesVisual Fields

Identifiers

PMID35363793
PMCPMC8975013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.