Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35363780›Full record

Trial reportPLoS neglected tropical diseases2022

Larval source reduction with a purpose: Designing and evaluating a household- and school-based intervention in coastal Kenya.

Jenna E Forsyth, Arielle Kempinsky, Helen O Pitchik, Catharina J Alberts, Francis M Mutuku, Lydiah Kibe, Nicole M Ardoin, A Desiree LaBeaud

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Epidemiological characterisation of dengue fever across Saudi Arabia.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jenna E ForsythStanford Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1888-3967
Arielle KempinskyDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1938-6698
Helen O PitchikDivision of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5665-0884
Catharina J AlbertsDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5604-3689
Francis M MutukuTechnical University of Mombasa, Mombasa, Kenya.
Lydiah KibeEastern and Southern Africa Centre of International Parasite Control, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Nicole M ArdoinStanford Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
A Desiree LaBeaudDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince Aedes aegypti mosquitoes preferentially breed in domestic containers, control efforts focus on larval source reduction. Our objectives were to design and test the effectiveness of a source reduction intervention to improve caregiver knowledge and behaviors in coastal Kenya. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe conducted a cluster-randomized controlled trial with 261 households from 5 control villages and 259 households from 5 intervention villages. From each household, one child (10-16 years old) and his or her primary caregiver participated in the intervention. We assessed caregiver knowledge and behavior at baseline, as well as 3 and 12 months after the intervention. We assessed household entomological indices at baseline and 12 months after the intervention to avoid seasonal interference. We conducted qualitative interviews with 34 caregivers to understand barriers and facilitators to change. We counted and weighed containers collected by children and parents during a community container clean-up and recycling event. After 12 months, caregiver knowledge about and self-reported behavior related to at least one source reduction technique was more than 50 percentage points higher in the intervention compared to control arm (adjusted risk differences for knowledge: 0.69, 95% CI [0.56 to 0.82], and behavior: 0.58 [0.43 to 0.73]). Respondents stated that other family members' actions were the primary barriers to proper container management. The number of containers at households did not differ significantly across arms even though children and parents collected 17,200 containers (1 ton of plastics) which were used to planted 4,000 native trees as part of the community event. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our study demonstrates that source reduction interventions can be effective if designed with an understanding of the social and entomological context. Further, source reduction is not an individual issue, but rather a social/communal issue, requiring the participation of other household and community members to be sustained.

Indexed as

AedesDengueAdolescentAnimalsChildFemaleHumansKenyaLarvaMaleMosquito ControlPlant Breeding

Identifiers

PMID35363780
PMCPMC9007363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.