ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022
Matrix Inversion and Subset Selection (MISS): A pipeline for mapping of diverse cell types across the murine brain.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Selective vulnerability of monoaminergic neurons and network spread of alpha-synuclein jointly explain pathology progression in Parkinson's disease models.Neurobiology of disease · 2026Article
- Selector: A General Python Library for Diverse Subset Selection.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Selector: A General Python Library for Diverse Subset Selection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Searching for the cellular underpinnings of the selective vulnerability to tauopathic insults in Alzheimer's disease.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Cellular underpinnings of the selective vulnerability to tauopathic insults in Alzheimer's disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Connectome-based biophysics models of Alzheimer's disease diagnosis and prognosis.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Cell-type-specific densities in mouse somatosensory cortex derived from scRNA-seq andFrontiers in neuroanatomy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The advent of increasingly sophisticated imaging platforms has allowed for the visualization of the murine nervous system at single-cell resolution. However, current experimental approaches have not yet produced whole-brain maps of a comprehensive set of neuronal and nonneuronal types that approaches the cellular diversity of the mammalian cortex. Here, we aim to fill in this gap in knowledge with an open-source computational pipeline, Matrix Inversion and Subset Selection (MISS), that can infer quantitatively validated distributions of diverse collections of neural cell types at 200-μm resolution using a combination of single-cell RNA sequencing (RNAseq) and in situ hybridization datasets. We rigorously demonstrate the accuracy of MISS against literature expectations. Importantly, we show that gene subset selection, a procedure by which we filter out low-information genes prior to performing deconvolution, is a critical preprocessing step that distinguishes MISS from its predecessors and facilitates the production of cell-type maps with significantly higher accuracy. We also show that MISS is generalizable by generating high-quality cell-type maps from a second independently curated single-cell RNAseq dataset. Together, our results illustrate the viability of computational approaches for determining the spatial distributions of a wide variety of cell types from genetic data alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.