Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35363547›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of genomics and human genetics2022

Equity in Genomic Medicine.

Chanita Hughes Halbert

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of genomics and human genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Association BetweenPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Genomic Medicine: Considerations for Addressing Health Equity.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chanita Hughes HalbertDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA; email: hughesha@usc.edu.
University of Southern California · US

Funding

USC/NORRIS COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER (CORE) SUPPORTP30CA014089 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Fumito Ito · 1985 to 2026
$181.4M
Tissue Modeling & Drug Development Shared Resources CoreU54CA233444 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI FERN Jureidini WEBB · 2018 to 2026
$12.1M
Sociobiological Responses to Stress in Prostate Cancer SurvivorsU54MD010706 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI LENERT, LESLIE A. · 2016 to 2020
$8.0M
Science of Behavior Change in African American Breast Cancer SurvivorsR21CA235852 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI HUGHES-HALBERT, CHANITA A. · 2018 to 2019
$299k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014089NCI NIH HHS R21 CA235852NCI NIH HHS U54 CA233444NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD010706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the completion of the Human Genome Project, considerable progress has been made in translating knowledge about the genetic basis of disease risk and treatment response into clinical services and public health interventions that have greater precision. It is anticipated that more precision approaches to early detection, prevention, and treatment will be developed and will enhance equity in healthcare and outcomes among disparity populations. Reduced access to genomic medicine research, clinical services, and public health interventions has the potential to exacerbate disparities in genomic medicine. The purpose of this article is to describe these challenges to equity in genomic medicine and identify opportunities and future directions for addressing these issues. Efforts are needed to enhance access to genomic medicine research, clinical services, and public health interventions, and additional research that examines the clinical utility of precision medicine among disparity populations should be prioritized to ensure equity in genomic medicine.

Indexed as

Genomic MedicinePrecision MedicineDelivery of Health CareGenomicsHumansequitygenomic medicineminority healthtranslational research

Identifiers

PMID35363547
PMCPMC12520619
OpenAlexW4220831051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.