Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35363507›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of biomedical data science2022

Phenotypic Causal Inference Using Genome-Wide Association Study Data: Mendelian Randomization and Beyond.

Venexia M Walker, Jie Zheng, Tom R Gaunt, George Davey Smith

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of biomedical data science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. RNA variation as the driver of genomic efficiency and phenotypic complexity.International journal of biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Venexia M WalkerMRC (Medical Research Council) Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; email: venexia.walker@bristol.ac.uk.
Jie ZhengMRC (Medical Research Council) Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; email: venexia.walker@bristol.ac.uk.
Tom R GauntMRC (Medical Research Council) Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; email: venexia.walker@bristol.ac.uk.
George Davey SmithMRC (Medical Research Council) Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; email: venexia.walker@bristol.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

statistics for genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are increasingly available for downstream analyses. Meanwhile, the popularity of causal inference methods has grown as we look to gather robust evidence for novel medical and public health interventions. This has led to the development of methods that use GWAS summary statistics for causal inference. Here, we describe these methods in order of their escalating complexity, from genetic associations to extensions of Mendelian randomization that consider thousands of phenotypes simultaneously. We also cover the assumptions and limitations of these approaches before considering the challenges faced by researchers performing causal inference using GWAS data. GWAS summary statistics constitute an important data source for causal inference research that offers a counterpoint to nongenetic methods when triangulating evidence. Continued efforts to address the challenges in using GWAS data for causal inference will allow the full impact of these approaches to be realized.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyMendelian Randomization AnalysisCausalityPhenotypecauseeffectgenetic variantGWASinferencepolymorphism

Identifiers

PMID35363507
PMCPMC7614231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.