ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2022
The auto segmentation for cardiac structures using a dual-input deep learning network based on vision saliency and transformer.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing morphometric assessment of the aorta and left ventricle from dynamic CT: a deep learning-based study.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based cardiac computed tomography angiography left atrial segmentation and quantification in atrial fibrillation patients: a multi-model comparative study.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Article
- Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation for ventricular tachycardia: a review of clinical trials and emerging roles of imaging.Journal of radiation research · 2025Review
- Automatic Aortic Valve Extraction Using Deep Learning with Contrast-Enhanced Cardiac CT Images.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Article
- Evolving perspectives on aortic stenosis: the increasing importance of evaluating the right ventricle before aortic valve intervention.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- The auto segmentation for cardiac structures using a dual-input deep learning network based on vision saliency and transformer.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAccurate segmentation of cardiac structures on coronary CT angiography (CCTA) images is crucial for the morphological analysis, measurement, and functional evaluation. In this study, we achieve accurate automatic segmentation of cardiac structures on CCTA image by adopting an innovative deep learning method based on visual attention mechanism and transformer network, and its practical application value is discussed.
methodsWe developed a dual-input deep learning network based on visual saliency and transformer (VST), which consists of self-attention mechanism for cardiac structures segmentation. Sixty patients' CCTA subjects were randomly selected as a development set, which were manual marked by an experienced technician. The proposed vision attention and transformer mode was trained on the patients CCTA images, with a manual contour-derived binary mask used as the learning-based target. We also used the deep supervision strategy by adding auxiliary losses. The loss function of our model was the sum of the Dice loss and cross-entropy loss. To quantitatively evaluate the segmentation results, we calculated the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD). Meanwhile, we compare the volume of automatic segmentation and manual segmentation to analyze whether there is statistical difference.
resultsFivefold cross-validation was used to benchmark the segmentation method. The results showed the left ventricular myocardium (LVM, DSC = 0.87), the left ventricular (LV, DSC = 0.94), the left atrial (LA, DSC = 0.90), the right ventricular (RV, DSC = 0.92), the right atrial (RA, DSC = 0.91), and the aortic (AO, DSC = 0.96). The average DSC was 0.92, and HD was 7.2 ± 2.1 mm. In volume comparison, except LVM and LA (p < 0.05), there was no significant statistical difference in other structures. Proposed method for structural segmentation fit well with the true profile of the cardiac substructure, and the model prediction results closed to the manual annotation.
conclusionsThe adoption of the dual-input and transformer architecture based on visual saliency has high sensitivity and specificity to cardiac structures segmentation, which can obviously improve the accuracy of automatic substructure segmentation. This is of gr.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.