Trial reportThe oncologist2022
FDA Approval Summary: Ruxolitinib for Treatment of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease after Failure of One or Two Lines of Systemic Therapy.
Trial report in The oncologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03112603 (A Phase III Randomized Open-label Multi-center Study of Ruxolitinib vs. Best Available Therapy in Patients With Corticosteroid-refractory Chronic Graft vs Host Disease After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III Randomized Open-label Multi-center Study of Ruxolitinib vs. Best Available Therapy in Patients With Corticosteroid-refractory Chronic Graft vs Host Disease After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation (REACH3)
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evolving Paradigms in Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease: From Global Immunosuppression to Precision Targeted and Cell-Based Therapies.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Pooled it
- Optimal Treatment of Steroid-refractory Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease (cGvHD) in the Era of Novel drugs - a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease: A meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Pooled it
- Ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory acute graft-vs-host disease: Japanese subgroup analysis of the randomized REACH2 trial.International journal of hematology · 2024Trial
- Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease, Part 1: How Preclinical Models Shape Our Understanding of Biology and Pave the Way for Future Therapeutic Interventions.Transplantation · 2025Review
- Infections in steroid-refractory chronic graft versus host disease patients treated with ruxolitinib, ibrutinib, or belumosudil.Bone marrow transplantation · 2025Article
- Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Precision Dosing of Janus Kinase Inhibitors: Protocol for a Prospective Observational Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- NIH Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease Consensus Conference 2025 Update.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2025Review
- Review
- Review
- Oral Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Current Treatment, and Emerging Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- The JAK-STAT pathway: from structural biology to cytokine engineering.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024Review
- Early Access for Medicines in ITALY: The Case of Ruxolitinib for Patients with Graft-Versus-Host Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
On September 22, 2021, the Food and Drug Administration approved ruxolitinib for the treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) after the failure of one or two lines of systemic therapy in adult and pediatric patients 12 years and older. Approval was based on Study INCB 18424-365 (REACH-3; CINC424D2301; NCT03112603), a randomized, open-label, multicenter trial of ruxolitinib in comparison to best available therapy (BAT) for the treatment of corticosteroid-refractory cGVHD occurring after the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. A total of 329 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either ruxolitinib 10 mg twice daily (n = 165) or BAT (n = 164). BAT was selected by the investigator prior to randomization. The overall response rate through Cycle 7 Day 1 was 70% (95% CI, 63-77) in the ruxolitinib arm, and 57% (95% CI, 49-65) in the BAT arm. The median duration of response, calculated from first response to progression, death, or initiation of new systemic therapies for cGVHD, was 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.2-6.7) for the ruxolitinib arm and 2.1 months (95% CI, 1.6-3.2) for the BAT arm; and the median time from first response to death or initiation of new systemic therapies for cGVHD was 25 months (95% CI, 16.8-not estimable) for the ruxolitinib arm and 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.1-7.8) for the BAT arm. Common adverse reactions included anemia, thrombocytopenia, and infections. Given the observed response rate with durability, the clinical benefit of ruxolitinib appears to outweigh the risks of treatment for cGVHD after the failure of one or two lines of systemic therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.