Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35363262›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2022

Precision Medicine in Pancreatic Cancer: Patient-Derived Organoid Pharmacotyping Is a Predictive Biomarker of Clinical Treatment Response.

Toni T Seppälä, Jacquelyn W Zimmerman, Reecha Suri, Haley Zlomke, Gabriel D Ivey, Annamaria Szabolcs, Christopher R Shubert, John L Cameron, William R Burns, Kelly J Lafaro and 12 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Toni T SeppäläDivision of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-4940-3498
Jacquelyn W ZimmermanDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-7775-2943
Reecha SuriDivision of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Haley ZlomkeDivision of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-3544-6841
Gabriel D IveyDivision of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-5287-9278
Annamaria SzabolcsThe Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Christopher R ShubertDivision of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
John L CameronDivision of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
William R BurnsDivision of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Kelly J LafaroDivision of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-7070-7269
Jin HeDivision of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-9149-2247
Christopher L WolfgangDepartment of Surgery at New York University Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York.
Ying S ZouCancer Convergence Institute, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Lei ZhengDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
David A TuvesonLustgarten Foundation Pancreatic Cancer Research Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-8017-2712
James R EshlemannCancer Convergence Institute, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
David P RyanThe Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Alec C KimmelmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology at New York University Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York.
Theodore S HongThe Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-8481-6581
David T TingThe Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-3261-2322
Elizabeth M JaffeeDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-3841-6549
Richard A BurkhartDivision of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-1087-0870
Johns Hopkins University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USNew York University · USCold Spring Harbor Laboratory · USUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

Tumor Antigens for Individual Signatures and TherapyP50CA062924 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LENNON, ANNE MARIE · 1993 to 2022
$54.6M
ONCOLOGY: CHEMOTHERAPY, IMMUNOLOGY, BIOLOGYT32CA009071 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Mary Y Armanios, Nilofer S. Azad · 1985 to 2026
$12.8M
Transforming Human Pancreatic Cancer Into An Immunologic DiseaseP01CA247886 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ZHENG, LEI · 2021 to 2025
$12.7M
Clinical and Laboratory Research Training for Surgical OncologistsT32CA126607 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CAMERON, ANDREW M. · 2008 to 2024
$6.0M
Targeting the Immunosuppressive Tumor Microenvironment of Pancreatic Cancer with a Neoadjuvant Platform Clinical TrialR01CA197296 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI William Reece Burns, Eric Christenson · 2015 to 2026
$5.7M
Personalized preclinical models in pancreas cancer: a tractable approach to precision medicineK08CA248710 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BURKHART, RICHARD ANDREW · 2020 to 2024
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA248710NCI NIH HHS P01 CA247886NCI NIH HHS P50 CA062924NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197296NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009071NCI NIH HHS T32 CA126607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatient-derived organoids (PDO) are a promising technology to support precision medicine initiatives for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). PDOs may improve clinical next-generation sequencing (NGS) and enable rapid ex vivo chemotherapeutic screening (pharmacotyping). EXPERIMENTAL

designPDOs were derived from tissues obtained during surgical resection and endoscopic biopsies and studied with NGS and pharmacotyping. PDO-specific pharmacotype is assessed prospectively as a predictive biomarker of clinical therapeutic response by leveraging data from a randomized controlled clinical trial.

resultsClinical sequencing pipelines often fail to detect PDAC-associated somatic mutations in surgical specimens that demonstrate a good pathologic response to previously administered chemotherapy. Sequencing the PDOs derived from these surgical specimens, after biomass expansion, improves the detection of somatic mutations and enables quantification of copy number variants. The detection of clinically relevant mutations and structural variants is improved following PDO biomass expansion. On clinical trial, PDOs were derived from biopsies of treatment-naïve patients prior to treatment with FOLFIRINOX (FFX). Ex vivo PDO pharmacotyping with FFX components predicted clinical therapeutic response in these patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced PDAC treated in a neoadjuvant or induction paradigm. PDO pharmacotypes suggesting sensitivity to FFX components were associated with longitudinal declines of tumor marker, carbohydrate-antigen 19-9 (CA-19-9), and favorable RECIST imaging response.

conclusionsPDOs established from tissues obtained from patients previously receiving cytotoxic chemotherapies can be accomplished in a clinically certified laboratory. Sequencing PDOs following biomass expansion improves clinical sequencing quality. High in vitro sensitivity to standard-of-care chemotherapeutics predicts good clinical response to systemic chemotherapy in PDAC. See related commentary by Zhang et al., p. 3176.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorHumansOrganoidsPrecision MedicineBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID35363262
PMCPMC9357072
OpenAlexW4221042451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.