ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2022
Intracameral Bacteriophage Injection as Postoperative Prophylaxis for Enterococcus faecalis-Induced Endophthalmitis After Cataract Surgery in Rabbits.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current Recommendations, Antibiotic Resistance, and Emerging Treatments for Gram-Positive Ocular Infections in the United States.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- RNA sequencing and bioinformatics analysis of blood from patients with cortical cataracts.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- In Vitro Activity of Bacteriophages Against Ocular Methicillin-resistant S. aureus Isolates Collected in the US.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Article
- Phage therapeutic delivery methods and clinical trials for combating clinically relevant pathogens.Therapeutic delivery · 2025Review
- Bacteriophage therapy reducesAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Post-cataract surgery bacterial endophthalmitis is a serious postoperative complication, and Enterococcus spp.-induced endophthalmitis reportedly has a particularly poor visual prognosis. This study aimed to demonstrate the prophylactic effect of postoperative intracameral phage administration in Enterococcus faecalis-induced endophthalmitis after cataract surgery in rabbits. Methods: Endophthalmitis was induced in rabbits by injecting E. faecalis into the anterior chamber just after lensectomy while simultaneously administering either phage phiEF24C-P2 or vehicle. Retinal function was evaluated using electroretinography. The number of viable bacteria and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity in the eye and histopathologic examinations were analyzed 48 hours after infection. Results: In the vehicle-treated group, retinal function at 24 hours after infection was impaired, and the number of viable bacteria and MPO activity in the eye increased 48 hours later. In the phage-administered group, retinal function was maintained; the number of viable bacteria and MPO activity were significantly suppressed. Histopathologic examinations showed disruption of the retinal layers and the presence of numerous E. faecalis in the lens capsule and vitreous cavity in vehicle-treated eyes. In contrast, retinal structures were intact, and no E. faecalis staining was observed in phage-treated eyes. No retinal dysfunction was observed in the group that received phage only without lensectomy; almost no phage was detected in the eyes after 14 days of treatment. Conclusions: Phage administration in the anterior chamber did not cause retinal dysfunction and suppressed postoperative endophthalmitis in rabbits. Translational Relevance: In vivo results of intracameral phage administration suggest that phages are a promising prophylactic candidate for postoperative endophthalmitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.