Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35363146›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2022

Predicting Falls in Long-term Care Facilities: Machine Learning Study.

Rahul Thapa, Anurag Garikipati, Sepideh Shokouhi, Myrna Hurtado, Gina Barnes, Jana Hoffman, Jacob Calvert, Lynne Katzmann, Qingqing Mao, Ritankar Das

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cardiovascular Disorders and Falls Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Machine Learning Differentiation of Autism Spectrum Sub-Classifications.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rahul ThapaDascena Inc., Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1137-955X
Anurag GarikipatiDascena Inc., Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2230-2187
Sepideh ShokouhiDascena Inc., Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6904-1861
Myrna HurtadoDascena Inc., Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0704-8384
Gina BarnesDascena Inc., Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8093-0245
Jana HoffmanDascena Inc., Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7745-3900
Jacob CalvertDascena Inc., Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9173-0946
Lynne KatzmannJuniper Communities, Bloomfield, NJ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3142-1946
Qingqing MaoDascena Inc., Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6001-6723
Ritankar DasDascena Inc., Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1326-844X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShort-term fall prediction models that use electronic health records (EHRs) may enable the implementation of dynamic care practices that specifically address changes in individualized fall risk within senior care facilities.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to implement machine learning (ML) algorithms that use EHR data to predict a 3-month fall risk in residents from a variety of senior care facilities providing different levels of care.

methodsThis retrospective study obtained EHR data (2007-2021) from Juniper Communities' proprietary database of 2785 individuals primarily residing in skilled nursing facilities, independent living facilities, and assisted living facilities across the United States. We assessed the performance of 3 ML-based fall prediction models and the Juniper Communities' fall risk assessment. Additional analyses were conducted to examine how changes in the input features, training data sets, and prediction windows affected the performance of these models.

resultsThe Extreme Gradient Boosting model exhibited the highest performance, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.846 (95% CI 0.794-0.894), specificity of 0.848, diagnostic odds ratio of 13.40, and sensitivity of 0.706, while achieving the best trade-off in balancing true positive and negative rates. The number of active medications was the most significant feature associated with fall risk, followed by a resident's number of active diseases and several variables associated with vital signs, including diastolic blood pressure and changes in weight and respiratory rates. The combination of vital signs with traditional risk factors as input features achieved higher prediction accuracy than using either group of features alone.

conclusionsThis study shows that the Extreme Gradient Boosting technique can use a large number of features from EHR data to make short-term fall predictions with a better performance than that of conventional fall risk assessments and other ML models. The integration of routinely collected EHR data, particularly vital signs, into fall prediction models may generate more accurate fall risk surveillance than models without vital signs. Our data support the use of ML models for dynamic, cost-effective, and automated fall predictions in different types of senior care facilities.

Indexed as

agingassisted living facilitiesblood pressureelderly careelderly populationfall predictionindependent living facilitiesmachine learningolder adultskilled nursing facilitiesvital signs

Identifiers

PMID35363146
PMCPMC9015781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.