Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35363143›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2022

Implementing a Health Care Professional-Supported Digital Intervention for Survivors of Cancer in Primary Care: Qualitative Process Evaluation of the Renewed Intervention.

Jazzine Smith, Rosie Essery, Lucy Yardley, Alison Richardson, Joanna Slodkowska-Barabasz, Claire Foster, Eila Watson, Chloe Grimmett, Adam W A Geraghty, Paul Little and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jazzine SmithClinical and Community Applications of Health Psychology, School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8795-5752
Rosie EsseryClinical and Community Applications of Health Psychology, School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2702-6951
Lucy YardleyClinical and Community Applications of Health Psychology, School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3853-883X
Alison RichardsonSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3127-5755
Joanna Slodkowska-BarabaszCommunity and Public Health Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0878-9504
Claire FosterSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4703-8378
Eila WatsonCommunity and Public Health Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3592-1315
Chloe GrimmettSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7540-7206
Adam W A GeraghtyPrimary Care Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7984-8351
Paul LittlePrimary Care Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3664-1873
Katherine BradburyClinical and Community Applications of Health Psychology, School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5513-7571

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care plays an important role in supporting survivors of cancer; however, support is limited because of practitioners' perceived lack of expertise and time. A digital intervention for survivors of cancer could provide an efficient way for primary care staff to support survivors of cancer without the need to accumulate expertise and skills to help patients make behavior changes; providing very brief support alongside this could maximize adherence to digital interventions. Renewed is a digital intervention that combines web-based behavior change advice with brief health care practitioner support from a nurse or health care assistant. Knowledge about the views and experiences of primary care staff providing support alongside a digital intervention for survivors of cancer is sparse, limiting the understanding of the acceptability and feasibility of this type of intervention.

objectiveThis study aims to explore supporters' experiences of providing support to survivors of cancer using Renewed, understand potential barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of Renewed in practice, and investigate the strengths and weaknesses of the intervention from the perspective of health care professionals.

methodsThis was a qualitative process evaluation nested within a large trial evaluating Renewed. A total of 28 semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with nurses and health care assistants. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.

resultsFour themes were developed during the analysis, which reflected the factors that supporters identified as hindering or enabling them to provide support alongside Renewed Online: Renewed Online as an acceptable digital tool with some improvements, confidence in enacting the supporter role, practicalities of delivering support alongside a digital intervention, and managing a patient-led approach. The analysis suggests that supporters perceived that a digital intervention such as Renewed would be beneficial in supporting survivors of cancer in primary care and fit within current practices. However, barriers to providing support alongside the intervention were also identified, including concerns about how to facilitate rapport building and, in a minority, concerns about using a nondirective approach, in which most advice and support is provided through digital interventions, with brief additional support provided by primary care staff.

conclusionsThese findings add to the literature on how best to provide support alongside digital interventions, suggesting that although most practitioners cope well with a nondirective approach, a minority requires more training to feel confident in implementing this. This study suggests that the barriers to providing formal support to survivors of cancer in primary care could be successfully overcome with an approach such as Renewed, where a digital intervention provides most of the support and expertise, and health care practitioners provide additional brief human support to maximize engagement. Strategies to maximize the chances of successful implementation for this type of intervention are also discussed.

Indexed as

digital interventionhealth care professionaloncologyposttreatmentprimary careprocess evaluationquality of lifeweb-based

Identifiers

PMID35363143
PMCPMC9015743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.