Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35363104›Full record

ReviewDrug delivery2022

Nanodelivery of essential oils as efficient tools against antimicrobial resistance: a review of the type and physical-chemical properties of the delivery systems and applications.

Victoria Dupuis, Constantin Cerbu, Lucjan Witkowski, Adrian-Valentin Potarniche, Maria Cristina Timar, Monika Żychska, Cristina M Sabliov

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug delivery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. EnhancedDrug delivery · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Chitosan-Based Nanoencapsulation of Mānuka Oil for Periodontal Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Victoria DupuisDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Constantin CerbuDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Lucjan WitkowskiLaboratory of Veterinary Epidemiology and Economic, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW), Warsaw, Poland.
Adrian-Valentin PotarnicheDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Maria Cristina TimarFaculty of Furniture Design and Wood Engineering, Department of Wood Processing and Wood Products Design, Transilvania University of Brasov, Brasov, Romania.
Monika ŻychskaLaboratory of Veterinary Epidemiology and Economic, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW), Warsaw, Poland.
Cristina M SabliovBiological and Agricultural Engineering Department, Louisiana State University and LSU Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca · ROWarsaw University of Life Sciences · PLLouisiana State University Agricultural Center · USTransylvania University of Brașov · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review provides a synthesis of the last ten years of research on nanodelivery systems used for the delivery of essential oils (EOs), as well as their potential as a viable alternative to antibiotics in human and veterinary therapy. The use of essential oils alone in therapy is not always possible due to several limitations but nanodelivery systems seem to be able to overcome these issues. The choice of the essential oil, as well as the choice of the nanodelivery system influences the therapeutic efficacy obtained. While several studies on the characterization of EOs exist, this review assesses the characteristics of the nanomaterials used for the delivery of essential oils, as well as impact on the functionality of nanodelivered essential oils, and successful applications. Two classes of delivery systems stand out: polymeric nanoparticles (NPs) including chitosan, cellulose, zein, sodium alginate, and poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA), and lipidic NPs including nanostructured lipid carriers, solid lipid NPs, nanoemulsions, liposomes, and niosomes. While the advantages and disadvantages of these delivery systems and information on stability, release, and efficacy of the nanodelivered EOs are covered in the literature as presented in this review, essential information, such as the speed of emergence of a potential bacteria resistance to these new systems, or dosages for each type of infection and for each animal species or humans is still missing today. Therefore, more quantitative and

Indexed as

ChitosanOils, VolatileAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialPolymersAnti-Bacterial AgentsChitosanOils, VolatilePolymersantibiotic resistanceessential oilsNanodeliverytherapy

Identifiers

PMID35363104
PMCPMC8979527
OpenAlexW4220733774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.