Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35362857›Full record

Observational studyCJEM2022

Treatments, resource utilization, and outcomes of COVID-19 patients presenting to emergency departments across pandemic waves: an observational study by the Canadian COVID-19 Emergency Department Rapid Response Network (CCEDRRN).

Corinne M Hohl, Rhonda J Rosychuk, Jeffrey P Hau, Jake Hayward, Megan Landes, Justin W Yan, Daniel K Ting, Michelle Welsford, Patrick M Archambault, Eric Mercier and 7 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in CJEM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04702945 (Canadian COVID-19 Emergency Department Rapid Response Network), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04702945 unknown statusnot on this map

Canadian COVID-19 Emergency Department Rapid Response Network (CCEDRRN) - Population-based Registry of Suspected and Confirmed COVID-19 Cases

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2020 to 2023Enrolled200,000ConditionsCovid-19
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Outcomes for people experiencing homelessness with COVID-19 presenting to emergency departments in Canada, compared with housed patients.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. The response of Canada's clinical health research ecosystem to the COVID-19 pandemic.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Corinne M HohlDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. corinne.hohl@ubc.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-9210-7838
Rhonda J RosychukDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Jeffrey P HauDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jake HaywardDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Megan LandesDivision of Emergency Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Justin W YanDivision of Emergency Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
Daniel K TingDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Michelle WelsfordDivision of Emergency Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Patrick M ArchambaultDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Eric MercierCentre de Recherche, CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Kavish ChandraDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie Medicine New Brunswick, Saint John, NB, Canada.
Philip DavisDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Samuel VaillancourtDivision of Emergency Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Murdoch LeeiesDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Serena SmallDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Laurie J MorrisonDivision of Emergency Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Canadian COVID-19 Rapid Response Network (CCEDRRN) investigators for the Network of Canadian Emergency Researchers, for the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group

Funding

Fondation du CHU de Québec Octroi No. 4007Genome BC COV024Ontario Ministry of Colleges and Universities C-655-2129Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation 5357The Canadian Institutes of Health Research 447679
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) evolved between pandemic waves. Our objective was to compare treatments, acute care utilization, and outcomes of COVID-19 patients presenting to emergency departments (ED) across pandemic waves.

methodsThis observational study enrolled consecutive eligible COVID-19 patients presenting to 46 EDs participating in the Canadian COVID-19 ED Rapid Response Network (CCEDRRN) between March 1 and December 31, 2020. We collected data by retrospective chart review. Our primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included treatments, hospital and ICU admissions, ED revisits and readmissions. Logistic regression modeling assessed the impact of pandemic wave on outcomes.

resultsWe enrolled 9,967 patients in 8 provinces, 3,336 from the first and 6,631 from the second wave. Patients in the second wave were younger, fewer met criteria for severe COVID-19, and more were discharged from the ED. Adjusted for patient characteristics and disease severity, steroid use increased (odds ratio [OR] 7.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.2-8.9), and invasive mechanical ventilation decreased (OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.4-0.7) in the second wave compared to the first. After adjusting for differences in patient characteristics and disease severity, the odds of hospitalization (OR 0.7; 95% CI 0.6-0.8) and critical care admission (OR 0.7; 95% CI 0.6-0.9) decreased, while mortality remained unchanged (OR 0.7; 95% CI 0.5-1.1).

interpretationIn patients presenting to cute care facilities, we observed rapid uptake of evidence-based therapies and less use of experimental therapies in the second wave. We observed increased rates of ED discharges and lower hospital and critical care resource use over time. Substantial reductions in mechanical ventilation were not associated with increasing mortality. Advances in treatment strategies created health system efficiencies without compromising patient outcomes.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT04702945.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsCanadaEmergency Service, HospitalHumansRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2COVID-19; coronavirus disease 2019; SARS-COV-2; resource utilization; patient outcomes; pandemic waves

Identifiers

PMID35362857
PMCPMC8972682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.