Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35362751›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2022

Facilitating standardized COVID-19 suspicion prediction based on computed tomography radiomics in a multi-demographic setting.

Yeshaswini Nagaraj, Gonda de Jonge, Anna Andreychenko, Gabriele Presti, Matthias A Fink, Nikolay Pavlov, Carlo C Quattrocchi, Sergey Morozov, Raymond Veldhuis, Matthijs Oudkerk and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Yeshaswini NagarajDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands. y.nagaraj@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9288-9537
Gonda de JongeDepartment of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Anna AndreychenkoResearch and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia.
Gabriele PrestiUnit of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Departmental Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Matthias A FinkClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Nikolay PavlovResearch and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia.
Carlo C QuattrocchiUnit of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Departmental Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Sergey MorozovResearch and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia.
Raymond VeldhuisFaculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics Computer Science (EWI), Data management Biometrics (DMB), University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Matthijs OudkerkFaculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Peter M A van OoijenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLRussian Research Center for Molecular Diagnostics and Therapy · RUUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · ITHeidelberg University · DEUniversity of Twente · NL

Funding

Scientific Support of the Capital's Healthcare АААА-А20-120071090056-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop an automatic COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS)-based classification in a multi-demographic setting.

methodsThis multi-institutional review boards-approved retrospective study included 2720 chest CT scans (mean age, 58 years [range 18-100 years]) from Italian and Russian patients. Three board-certified radiologists from three countries assessed randomly selected subcohorts from each population and provided CO-RADS-based annotations. CT radiomic features were extracted from the selected subcohorts after preprocessing steps like lung lobe segmentation and automatic noise reduction. We compared three machine learning models, logistic regression (LR), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and random forest (RF) for the automated CO-RADS classification. Model evaluation was carried out in two scenarios, first, training on a mixed multi-demographic subcohort and testing on an independent hold-out dataset. In the second scenario, training was done on a single demography and externally validated on the other demography.

resultsThe overall inter-observer agreement for the CO-RADS scoring between the radiologists was substantial (k = 0.80). Irrespective of the type of validation test scenario, suspected COVID-19 CT scans were identified with an accuracy of 84%. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) interpretation showed that the "wavelet_(LH)_GLCM_Imc1" feature had a positive impact on COVID prediction both with and without noise reduction. The application of noise reduction improved the overall performance between the classifiers for all types.

conclusionUsing an automated model based on the COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS), we achieved clinically acceptable performance in a multi-demographic setting. This approach can serve as a standardized tool for automated COVID-19 assessment. KEYPOINTS: • Automatic CO-RADS scoring of large-scale multi-demographic chest CTs with mean AUC of 0.93 ± 0.04. • Validation procedure resembles TRIPOD 2b and 3 categories, enhancing the quality of experimental design to test the cross-dataset domain shift between institutions aiding clinical integration. • Identification of COVID-19 pneumonia in the presence of community-acquired pneumonia and other comorbidities with an AUC of 0.92.

Indexed as

COVID-19PneumoniaAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDemographyHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung AdultCOVID-19Deep learningDiagnostic imagingSARS-CoV-2Tomography X-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID35362751
PMCPMC8973680
OpenAlexW4221106022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.