ArticleHuman brain mapping2022
Mapping brain structure and function in professional fencers: A model to study training effects on central nervous system plasticity.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Hands off, brain off? A meta-analysis of neuroimaging data during active and passive driving.Brain and behavior · 2023Pooled it
- Mental Imagery in Fencing: Improving Point Control and Lunge Distance Through Visualization.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- The lateralized cerebellum: insights into motor, cognitive, and affective functioning across ages: a scoping review.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Sex-related differences in upper limb motor function in healthy subjects and multiple sclerosis patients: a multiparametric MRI study.Journal of neurology · 2023Article
- Mapping brain structure and function in professional fencers: A model to study training effects on central nervous system plasticity.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies have shown different patterns of structural and functional reorganization in high-level athletes compared with controls, but little is known about their relationship with interlimb coordination mechanisms. To this aim, we investigated brain structural and functional differences in high-level fencers compared with nonathlete controls and the MRI substrates of interlimb coordination in elite athletes. Fourteen right-handed male fencers (median age = 22.3 years) and 15 right-handed age- and sex-matched healthy subjects (median age = 22.4 years) underwent structural and functional MRI acquisition during the execution of cyclic bimanual-movements as well as during in-phase and antiphase hand/foot-movements of the dominant-right limbs. No between-group differences were found in gray matter volumes and white matter architecture. Active-fMRI showed that controls versus fencers had higher activations in parietal and temporal areas during bimanual-task; whereas fencers versus controls had higher activations in the basal ganglia. During in-phase task, controls versus fencers showed higher activation of right cerebellum, whereas fencers had higher activity mainly in frontal areas. The functional-connectivity (FC) analysis showed that fencers versus controls had an increased FC between left motor cortex and fronto-temporal areas as well as bilateral thalami during the different tasks. Intensive and prolonged fencing activity is associated with brain functional changes mainly involving frontal regions related to high-level motor control and planning of complex tasks. These modifications are likely to reflect an optimization of brain networks involved in motor activities, including interlimb coordination tasks, occurring after intensive training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.