Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35362649›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2022

Mapping brain structure and function in professional fencers: A model to study training effects on central nervous system plasticity.

Claudio Cordani, Paolo Preziosa, Roberto Gatti, Carlotta Castellani, Massimo Filippi, Maria Assunta Rocca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Claudio CordaniNeuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9014-7887
Paolo PreziosaNeuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7826-0019
Roberto GattiHumanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4669-1287
Carlotta CastellaniUniversity of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Massimo FilippiNeuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5485-0479
Maria Assunta RoccaNeuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2358-4320

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies have shown different patterns of structural and functional reorganization in high-level athletes compared with controls, but little is known about their relationship with interlimb coordination mechanisms. To this aim, we investigated brain structural and functional differences in high-level fencers compared with nonathlete controls and the MRI substrates of interlimb coordination in elite athletes. Fourteen right-handed male fencers (median age = 22.3 years) and 15 right-handed age- and sex-matched healthy subjects (median age = 22.4 years) underwent structural and functional MRI acquisition during the execution of cyclic bimanual-movements as well as during in-phase and antiphase hand/foot-movements of the dominant-right limbs. No between-group differences were found in gray matter volumes and white matter architecture. Active-fMRI showed that controls versus fencers had higher activations in parietal and temporal areas during bimanual-task; whereas fencers versus controls had higher activations in the basal ganglia. During in-phase task, controls versus fencers showed higher activation of right cerebellum, whereas fencers had higher activity mainly in frontal areas. The functional-connectivity (FC) analysis showed that fencers versus controls had an increased FC between left motor cortex and fronto-temporal areas as well as bilateral thalami during the different tasks. Intensive and prolonged fencing activity is associated with brain functional changes mainly involving frontal regions related to high-level motor control and planning of complex tasks. These modifications are likely to reflect an optimization of brain networks involved in motor activities, including interlimb coordination tasks, occurring after intensive training.

Indexed as

Brain MappingMotor CortexAdultBrainFunctional LateralityGray MatterHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung Adultathletesfunctional MRImotor coordinationMRIneuroplasticity

Identifiers

PMID35362649
PMCPMC9248301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.