Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35362559›Full record

ArticleJournal of the experimental analysis of behavior2022

Logical fallacies and misinterpretations that hinder progress in translational addiction neuroscience.

Justin C Strickland, William W Stoops, Matthew L Banks, Cassandra D Gipson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Relative Reinforcing Value of Menthol Among Young Adult Cigarette Smokers: Results From a Behavioral Choice Task.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Justin C StricklandDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
William W StoopsDepartment of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington.ORCID 0000-0002-8502-0160
Matthew L BanksDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University.ORCID 0000-0003-4949-5246
Cassandra D GipsonDepartment of Pharmacology and Nutritional Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington.ORCID 0000-0003-2372-9323

Funding

Neuroinflammatory and glutamatergic mechanisms of nicotine seekingR01DA046526 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI GIPSON-REICHARDT, CASSANDRA D · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
Glutamergic Mechanisms in Opioid and Cocaine Co-UseR33DA049130 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI GIPSON-REICHARDT, CASSANDRA D, STOOPS, WILLIAM WALTON · 2022 to 2024
$1.9M
Cholinergic modulation of glutamatergic signaling in nicotine addiction and relapseR21DA044479 · NIDA · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI GIPSON-REICHARDT, CASSANDRA D · 2018 to 2019
$461k
The role of negative reinforcement in drug abuseR21DA053820 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI BANKS, MATTHEW L · 2021 to 2022
$413k
Glutamergic Mechanisms in Opioid and Cocaine Co-UseR21DA049130 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI GIPSON-REICHARDT, CASSANDRA D, STOOPS, WILLIAM WALTON · 2020 to 2021
$402k
Glutamatergic mechanisms underlying nicotine addiction and relapse following nicotine reductionR03DA045881 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI GIPSON-REICHARDT, CASSANDRA D · 2018 to 2019
$154k
Behavioral Economics of Reduced-Nicotine Cigarettes: Interaction of Expectancy and Nicotine Dose ReductionR03DA054098 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI STRICKLAND, JUSTIN CHARLES · 2021 to 2021
$123k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA046526NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA045881NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA054098NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA044479NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA049130NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA053820NIDA NIH HHS R33 DA049130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substance use disorders (SUDs) are heterogeneous and complex, making the development of translationally predictive rodent and nonhuman primate models to uncover their neurobehavioral underpinnings difficult. Neuroscience-focused outcomes have become highly prevalent, and with this, the notion that SUDs are disorders of the brain embraced as a dominant theoretical orientation to understand SUD etiology and treatment. These efforts, however, have led to few efficacious pharmacotherapies, and in some cases (as with cocaine or methamphetamine), no pharmacotherapies have translated from preclinical models for clinical use. In this theoretical commentary, we first describe the development of animal models of substance use behaviors from a historical perspective. We then define and discuss three logical fallacies including 1) circular explanation, 2) affirming the consequent, and 3) reification that can apply to developed models. We then provide three case examples in which conceptual or logical issues exist in common methods (i.e., behavioral economic demand, escalation, and reinstatement). Alternative strategies to refocus behavioral models are suggested for the field to better bridge the translational divide between animal models, the clinical condition of SUDs, and current and future regulatory pathways for intervention development.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveCocaineMethamphetamineSubstance-Related DisordersAnimalsEconomics, BehavioralCocaineMethamphetamineaddictionanimalmodeltranslationtreatment

Identifiers

PMID35362559
PMCPMC9090969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.