ArticleESC heart failure2022
Impact of a cardio-oncology unit on prevention of cardiovascular events in cancer patients.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Toxicity and efficacy of four carmustine-substituted conditioning regimens followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in lymphoma: a real-world comparative study.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Real-world incidence of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction in a large, diverse, and contemporary cohort.ESC heart failure · 2026Article
- Brentuximab Vedotin With Adriamycin, Vinblastine, and Dacarbazine for Patients Aged 18-59 Years With Untreated Advanced Stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: The Largest Real-Life Series From Southern Italy Cancer Centers.European journal of haematology · 2026Observational
- Lymphoma and Long-Term cardiovascular disease risk: A comprehensive analysis from the UK biobank.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
- Prognostic impact of GNRI-IPI score in octogenarians with diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
- Polatuzumab vedotin, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (Pola-R-CHP) therapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in patients aged 80 years or older: a real-world study.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
- Liposomal doxorubicin in place of doxorubicin hydrochloride to prevent anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy in elderly patients with Hodgkin lymphoma.HemaSphere · 2025Article
- Cardio-Oncology Challenges in Elderly Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine for Hodgkin lymphoma: Real-world experience from a Los Angeles County hospital.SAGE open medicine · 2025Article
- Innate Immune Cells in Melanoma: Implications for Immunotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Risk factors of osimertinib-related cardiotoxicity in non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- A year in heart failure: updates of clinical and preclinical findings.ESC heart failure · 2023Review
- Risk and Management of Patients with Cancer and Heart Disease.Cardiology and therapy · 2023Review
- Potential Role of Global Longitudinal Strain in Cardiac and Oncological Patients Undergoing Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation (CORE).Clinics and practice · 2023Review
- Cancer survivorship at heart: a multidisciplinary cardio-oncology roadmap for healthcare professionals.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Impact of a cardio-oncology unit on prevention of cardiovascular events in cancer patients.ESC heart failure · 2022Article
- The pediatric oncology exercise field speeds up to address important issues regarding chemotherapy-related cardiotoxicity.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsAs the world population grows older, the co-existence of cancer and cardiovascular comorbidities becomes more common, complicating management of these patients. Here, we describe the impact of a large Cardio-Oncology unit in Southern Italy, characterizing different types of patients and discussing challenges in therapeutic management of cardiovascular complications. METHODS AND
resultsWe enrolled 231 consecutive patients referred to our Cardio-Oncology unit from January 2015 to February 2020. Three different types were identified, according to their chemotherapeutic statuses at first visit. Type 1 included patients naïve for oncological treatments, Type 2 patients already being treated with oncological treatments, and Type 3 patients who had already completed cancer treatments. Type 2 patients presented the highest incidence of cardiovascular events (46.2% vs. 12.3% in Type 1 and 17.9% in Type 3) and withdrawals from oncological treatments (5.1% vs. none in Type 1) during the observation period. Type 2 patients presented significantly worse 48 month-survival (32.1% vs. 16.7% in Type 1 and 17.9% in Type 3), and this was more evident when in the three groups we focused on patients with uncontrolled cardiovascular risk factors or overt cardiovascular disease at the first cardiologic assessment. Nevertheless, these patients showed the greatest benefit from our cardiovascular assessments, as witnessed by a small, but significant improvement in ejection fraction during follow-up (Type 2b: from 50 [20; 67] to 55 [35; 65]; P = 0.04).
conclusionsPatients who start oncological protocols without an accurate baseline cardiovascular evaluation are at major risk of developing cardiac complications due to antineoplastic treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.