Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35362096›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of haematology2022

Ofatumumab with iphosphamide, etoposide and cytarabine for patients with transplantation-ineligible relapsed and refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Ewa Paszkiewicz-Kozik, Wojciech Michalski, Michał Taszner, Monika Mordak-Domagała, Joanna Romejko-Jarosińska, Wanda Knopińska-Posłuszny, Jacek Najda, Anna Borawska, Monika Chełstowska, Monika Świerkowska and 18 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of haematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Characterization of Immune Reconstitution Patterns in B-cell Subsets Mediated by B-cell Targeted Therapies].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Ewa Paszkiewicz-KozikMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2629-3932
Wojciech MichalskiMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Michał TasznerMedical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Monika Mordak-DomagałaLower Silesian Center for Cellular Transplantation with National Bone Marrow Donor Registry, Wroclaw, Poland.
Joanna Romejko-JarosińskaMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4603-1112
Wanda Knopińska-PosłusznyMaritime Hospital, Gdynia, Poland.
Jacek NajdaMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland.
Anna BorawskaMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Monika ChełstowskaInstitute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Warsaw, Poland.
Monika ŚwierkowskaMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Anna Dąbrowska-IwanickaMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Agata MalendaInstitute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Warsaw, Poland.
Agnieszka Druzd-SitekMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Robert KoneckiMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Beata KumiegaSniadecki Memorial Specialist Hospital, Nowy Sacz, Poland.
Michał OsowieckiMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Beata OstrowskaMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Tomasz SzpilaInstitute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Warsaw, Poland.
Marcin SzymańskiMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Łukasz TargońskiMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Katarzyna Domańska-CzyżMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Lidia PopławskaMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Sebastian GiebelMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland.
Andrzej LangeLower Silesian Center for Cellular Transplantation with National Bone Marrow Donor Registry, Wroclaw, Poland.
Andrzej PlutaDepartment of Hematology, Brzozow Oncology Center, Brzozow, Poland.
Jan Maciej ZauchaMedical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Grzegorz RymkiewiczMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Jan WalewskiMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
National Institute of Oncology · HUInstytut Hematologii i Transfuzjologi · PLGdynia Maritime University · PLGerman National Bone Marrow Donor Registry · DEThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLGdańsk Medical University · PLPaństwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa w Nowym Sączu · PLSamodzielny Publiczny Zakład Opieki Zdrowotnej w Lubartowie · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficacy of salvage treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients who relapse or progress (rrDLBCL) after initial therapy is limited. Efficacy and safety of ofatumumab with iphosphamide, etoposide and cytarabine (O-IVAC) was evaluated in a single-arm study. Dosing was modified for elderly patients. Patients received up to six cycles of treatment. The primary end-point was the overall response rate (ORR). Patients were evaluated every two cycles and then six and 12 months after treatment. Other end-points included progression-free survival (PFS), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Seventy-seven patients received salvage treatment with O-IVAC. The average age was 56.8 years; 39% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of at least 3; 78% had disease of Ann Arbor stage 3 or 4; 58% received one or more prior salvage therapies. The ORR for O-IVAC was 54.5%. The median duration of study follow-up was 70 months. The median PFS and EFS were 16.3 months each. The median OS was 22.7 months. Age, ECOG performance status and the number of prior therapy lines were independent predictors of survival. Treatment-related mortality was 15.5%. O-IVAC showed a high response rate in a difficult-to-treat population and is an attractive treatment to bridge to potentially curative therapies.

Indexed as

Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseLymphoma, Non-HodgkinAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCytarabineEtoposideHumansIfosfamideMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRituximabSalvage TherapyAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCytarabineEtoposideIfosfamideofatumumabRituximabIVAC protocolofatumumabrefractory and relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphomasalvage treatment

Identifiers

PMID35362096
PMCPMC9322457
OpenAlexW4225853565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.